CreamCloud0
Hero
my point was more that to the person i was responding to that 'magic' is a specific phenomena in DND with specific connotations attached to it, and using 'magical' as a catch-all term for all beyond realworld 'mundane' power not distingishing between the specific force called 'Magic' and 'the fantastical/martial magic' causes confusion between people who read 'magical' with different connotations.Heh, as a veteran of the psionic debates, I have to emphasize ...
"
A magic is a magic is a magic.
Lovely the power of the
Impossiblest of the impossiblest puissance.
"
4e spoke plainly about "Martial magic". I feel this is the most useful approach, to characterize the different flavors magic and eschew debates about "nonmagic" or what defines "magic".
At the highest tiers, Fighters shift from a low magic fantasy genre to a high magic genre, and are necessarily more like superheroes than soldiers or streetfighters.
i have no issues with the martial power source/martial magic as far as i vaguely understand it because it let you do the fantastical feats in the game in a way that thematically felt like the heroes who were victorious against monsters and evil sorcerers with naught but a sword and sometimes not even that, rather than the 'wizard who uses sword magics'.
Last edited: