Azzy
ᚳᚣᚾᛖᚹᚢᛚᚠ (He/Him)
Some folks will complain no matter what.I do not understand what is making some folks grumpy about this news.
Some folks will complain no matter what.I do not understand what is making some folks grumpy about this news.
"Wizards printed a spell called water walk? What do they have against swimming?"Some folks will complain no matter what.
The price point of short, softcover adventures is pretty high nowadays. If they do go with a physical module, it'll be interesting to see what the price is. This is honestly something that's a lot more practical to do via PDF or DriveThruRPG nowadays, although those have other issues.What's also interesting to me is the comment that they would print more modules. We could do with a series of modules like the old style, not just Adventure Path books.
What I dislike about the DMG's Greyhawk chapter is it's anti Baklunish, or to put it more gently - Baklunish ignorant. In particular, the included WoG map ignores settlements that were added by the Living Greyawk Gazetteer's map and Anna Beyer's map. The DMG's map takes that region back to the original 1980 map's settlements, which is a surpising choice considering a number of later adventures and content, even written as early as the 80s, added Baklunish settlments. I agree that changing the Plains of Paynims is for the better - recently learned that paynim is a derogatory term/name.I liked it until I saw inexplicably making Yolande (I think it was Yolande) black, changing the Prince of Ulek to a Princess... the name changes I didn't care about since it was either obvious it'd be changed (Plains of the Paynims) or it's using the actual name, not the "common" name (Frost Barbarians etc. using their proper name). Changing the name of the Scarlet Brotherhood I think was a weird take that seemed to make no sense other than some numpty being upset at the word "Brotherhood" but the rest were like "Okay it's not a big deal". I wasn't even against adding the Goliath mayor of whatever city, because while I dislike them being a core race, it wasn't the most ridiculous thing.
The DMG's map takes that region back to the original 1980 map's settlements, which is a surpising choice considering a number of later adventures and content, even written as early as the 80s, added Baklunish settlments.
She is front and center on the current PHB cover, and shows up a few other places. Definitely black now, which is dandy as far as I am concerned.I'm not aware of any picture or reference in the 2024 DMG that depicts or describes Queen Yolande of Celene as black - is there? The only picture I've seen of her is in the LGG and it's black ink on white, so not possible to say. That said, she's definitely depicted as a demi-human Elf.
The name of the actual territory being called Shar us from the 2E Scarlet Brotherhood book.Renaming the Scarlet Brotherhood to Shar is weird. I get the source of the idea; LGG had a brief mention that visitors from the SB to Iron League cities intro'd themselves as emmisaries from the Kingdom of Shar. Also, the LGG map added a capitol for the SB which was named Hesuel Ilshar. I don't recall any mention of Shar in the WoG Book, or other early publication. Anyhow...seems a bit silly to me - SB were a brotherhod of monks, assassins and thiefs from a specific realm, who did a lot of espioage, pirtating and warring. So I don't get the reason to hide that by renaming their realm. But maybe WotC of 2024 was setting sail with the idea that they're a sisterhood and brotherhood?

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.