• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Mike Mearls "Invented The Baked Potato" in Xanathar's Guide With The Cleric Forge Domain

Making a change from all those lovely pictures of Jeremy Crawford on EN World's front page, this time it's Mike Mearls who speaks to D&D Beyond about the Cleric Forge Domain in Xanathar's Guide, along with some interesting observations about baked potatoes.


[video=youtube;nZznOH4-njM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZznOH4-njM[/video]​


"... one of those ones where it's like "Why wasn't this in the Player's Handbook?", right like it's the dwarf clerics have become so iconic to the game and it's funny because they weren't technically really like 2nd Edition let you play a dwarf cleric, but I think that people just naturally always, I don't know what it is about dwarves? Dwarves and clerics just goes together and I think part of it is because you have the story of Moradin forging the dwarves, he literally makes them, right, and I think that's mythically very interesting, this idea that you have a craftsman who's a God who basically challenges himself -- "Can I make a folk, , the dwarves, my children. I'm gonna [something] amount of iron and metal and ingots whatever it is , and that to me is really interesting and I think that would have such profound implications of that society where like your God physically made you out of iron, out of metal and breathed life into you, and so then you have that association of dwarves, of crafting things. Of course creation would be hopefully sacred to dwarves because that's what their deity does, that's what their deity did to create them.

And again this is what I think is interesting in D&D when you have the divine, the divine is knowable. Like Moradin's day to day desires might be unknowable or cryptic but Morden is a person that is like what happened, like people know, there's there's not a question of faith, it's a question of which team do you pick? And so the idea of the dwarf cleric is essentially to my mind when we were working on it, what I was thinking 100% was the dwarf cleric who decides "I am going to emulate Moradin, I want to be a great Smith, that the deity who created me was a great smith and I will follow those footsteps because creation is sacred to our folk".

And then since it's a cleric you have to ask yourself how do you use creation to beat down orcs and goblins? And then it's just like - make magic weapons. That's it, you get to imbue a weapon and make it magical and that just felt very sensible, very obvious; and the great thing is in there our system it's not game breaking; it's powerful but it's not over-the-top.

This is one of the subclasses I think really encapsulates when we're doing things really right the initial playtest feedback was through the roof positive. I think we had to tweak a few things here and there but it hit that note I think of ... I was joking when I said this should have been the Players Handbook but really it should've been in the Players Handbook because it's so iconic. As soon as we showed it to people they were just like "Yes this makes sense. This fits, the mechanics make sense, the mechanics are easy, there's nothing in those mechanics that's tricky or strange or clever. It's just obvious. I make things magical, I make my armor better and make my weapons better. I make things, that's it."

But it just hits such a resonant tone and that's always what we're shooting for we do these new subclasses - we want to hit that resonant tone. You can go for the thing that's very experimental that people haven't seen before, and that's part of the approach, you need to do some of that. But when you're doing things where people just look out and go "Oh yeah that's D&D", yes do you feel really you feeling good about yourself as a designer because I fill the gap that everyone wanted to play but they couldn't play. Maybe they didn't know the gap was empty until you gave them this, and then suddenly everyones playing it.

And I think that's how we are really truly growing the game when we do that, when you could imagine "Oh if you could go back in time and give Xanathar's to the Players Handbook team, this is one of the domains, one of the options, they would just be "Oh, yes, of course let's put this right in the Players Handbook."

That always feels good as a designer when you do that. To me it's it's not the exotic new wacky thing it's the thing that's just like, "You've invented baked potatoes. Now that you've invented it everyone will have these with their steak forever", I just feel like, "Wow, that's kind of cool!"

Because it fits, and that's when we know as designers, as creators, we're connecting with the audience, we're hitting on things that people want, we're hitting on things that just make sense to people, and I love that feeling as a designer on a game like Dungeons & Dragons, that has a history, that has a big active user base, it means we as designers are in touch with players, that work on the same page. I love that feeling."



Screen Shot 2017-10-02 at 20.33.34.png
 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad

No one's really been clamoring for any cleric domains because they already had seven of them in the book. The people who HAVE been clamoring for things have tended to be doing so for things that either hadn't been touched upon at all (for instance psionics, up until they finally released the UA on it)... or things that WotC had already said they weren't doing or were not doing right away and thus generated responses from those who didn't like that answer (the warlord for the former or various other campaign settings for the latter.)

I mean, no one's been clamoring for another wizard subclass either since they already have the most out of all the classes, but WotC's probably going to make one anyway. But when the point is attempted here by other people that "no one" wanted the Forge domain, that's when we can smirk and roll our eyes at it.
Thats putting words in my mouth. I never said nobody wants a forge cleric. I said it wasnt in most peoples top ten list along with the eladrin. I dont hate the forge cleric, but I think that alot of what we are going to get in the new book is in there because it was easy and not because its good or asked for. When your choices on the survey are arcana,forge, and grave cleric, Im not surprised that forge won out. So smirk and roll your eyes, I dont respect your opinion either.
 

Thats putting words in my mouth. I never said nobody wants a forge cleric. I said it wasnt in most peoples top ten list along with the eladrin.

Your thesis sentence, which came right before that "top ten" sentence, was "Most of the UAs have been poorly designed and not what alot of people are looking for. "

It's presumptuous of you to speak for others. You've seen in this thread that many people do want those things. You saw in the UA threads for those things that a lot of people want those things. You saw in the survey results that a lot of people want those things. And if you were around here from the playtest onward you've seen people mention they felt the dwarf was kinda left out of the cleric and that some elves were left out of the elf subraces and didn't like Eladrin being in the DMG for instance, and the rest of those elements were mentioned by others as well, and those people sometimes said they told WOTC in the surveys they want those things.

So you know a lot of people want those things - not because I say so, but because you saw lots of objective proof that's the case. It's just that you do not like them. Which is fine. What's not fine is your inability to reconcile you not liking them with other people liking them. As if they are mutually exclusive and everyone must think like you so there must be some good explanation that results in dismissing any conclusion that other people like them so that you can substitute you not liking them for almost everyone else not liking them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Your thesis sentence, which came right before that "top ten" sentence, was "Most of the UAs have been poorly designed and not what alot of people are looking for. "

It's presumptuous of you to speak for others. You've seen in this thread that many people do want those things. You saw in the UA threads for those things that a lot of people want those things. You saw in the survey results that a lot of people want those things. And if you were around here from the playtest onward you've seen people mention they felt the dwarf was kinda left out of the cleric and that some elves were left out of the elf subraces and didn't like Eladrin being in the DMG for instance, and the rest of those elements were mentioned by others as well, and those people sometimes said they told WOTC in the surveys they want those things.

So you know a lot of people want those things - not because I say so, but because you saw lots of objective proof that's the case. It's just that you do not like them. Which is fine. What's not fine is your inability to reconcile you not liking them with other people liking them. As if they are mutually exclusive and everyone must think like you so there must be some good explanation that results in dismissing any conclusion that other people like them so that you can substitute you not liking them for almost everyone else not liking them.
First off I have not seen anyone until this thread ask for a dwarf specific cleric. As a player I played dwaren clerics 9 out of ten times. The dwarf is made to be a life cleric and it fit fine considering moradin is a creater god, so bite me. Second, how many elf subraces do we need? Oh wheres my winged elf so people can complain about flyers again? Weres a sea elf? How about a star elf? We got wood elves but screw it I need a wild elf, they are slightly different.If your gonna make these claims provide links or its all bs. Show me all these people. Inever said you need to think like me. Once again youre putting words in my mouth . I have seen multiple threads on psionics or planescape. I have not seen any other threads asking for forge clerics until this thread. I did ask who had forge clerics in their top ten and so far only 2 peeps have spoken yes. Guess what you arent one of them, neither is defcon who said he doesnt have a top ten. All you are doing is what you are accusing me of and thats speaking for everyone else. Either link some proof or shut up and know your role.
Also I stick to my original quote about the UA articles, there was more negative feedback on these and other forums.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

First off I have not seen anyone until this thread ask for a dwarf specific cleric. As a player I played dwaren clerics 9 out of ten times. The dwarf is made to be a life cleric and it fit fine considering moradin is a creater god, so bite me.

How is creator the same as life domain, given the later is oriented on healing and not creating things?

Second, how many elf subraces do we need? Oh wheres my winged elf so people can complain about flyers again? Weres a sea elf? How about a star elf? We got wood elves but screw it I need a wild elf, they are slightly different.

The answer is AS MANY AS PEOPLE SEEM TO WANT. This was my point - YOU don't like them, you have reasons for not liking them, and so your analysis should end there for your opinion. But it doesn't. You go on to say "And therefore this isn't something others want as well". Guess what? Others seem to want more. And that should be OK. Their tastes don't have to match yours. It's OK that WOTC make things for people who want them, even if you personally don't.

If your gonna make these claims provide links or its all bs. Show me all these people.

YOU made the claim people don't want them. YOU support your claim. You have not. All you've done is whine that you don't like them and then assert others must not either. You admitted you saw some people in this very thread disagree, so you already know you must not have been exactly right in your claim, but you're trying to put the burden on me to disprove your claim before you put any effort in at all to support it? No.

I have seen multiple threads on psionics or planescape. I have not seen any other threads asking for forge clerics until this thread.

I agree some people want those things, but that does not in any way show they don't want those other things. I have seen many people ask for something more to the liking of dwarves for clerics and the original forge cleric thread had lots of people liking it and saying they had been looking for such a thing. It was ranked quite well. Go search for that forge cleric thread if you missed it. I am pretty surprised you didn't read it the first time, since you claimed to have the pulse of the community on that topic. How would you make such a claim without having ever even tried to read the thread about the topic?
 


I never said nobody wants a forge cleric.
Your thesis sentence, which came right before that "top ten" sentence, was "Most of the UAs have been poorly designed and not what alot of people are looking for. "
"Not what a lot of people are looking for" is in no way equivalent to "nobody wants."

UA's aren't final product, they're closer to brainstorming, it'd be a stroke of luck or genius if they were all (or any) that well-designed.

As far as a lot of people, well, D&D isn't what the vast majority are looking for, and in the context of D&Ders, well, we're divided enough that anything that's desired, at all, now, is probably desired by only a minority of fans...

(...imagine if the broader D&D fan community were judged by how it treats its least-priveledged minorities...)

... meh, probably couldn't be any worse than how the mainstream generally judged us....

First off I have not seen anyone until this thread ask for a dwarf specific cleric...
If they had, they'd've been told it was unnecessary and a waste of space, now that we're getting one, it's wonderful. ;)
OK, it's a baked potato. Really, isn't that kinda faint self-praise, when you think about it?

Second, how many elf subraces do we need?
0 (cf Talislanta)

I have seen multiple threads on psionics or planescape. I have not seen any other threads asking for forge clerics until this thread....
Also I stick to my original quote about the UA articles, there was more negative feedback on these and other forums.
Forums get particularly negative. Probably not that representative.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

I think wizards is lacking in almost all of the new stuff they have previewed months ago. I think mearls homebrew stuff is a joke and didnt belong in UA articles. Do we need another cleric domain? I dont think so, and I traditionally play clerics(dwarven clerics mostly). Im getting sick of wizards forcing magic items as a class ability on a game that magic items are supposed to be optional, instead of interesring and new powers. I thank god they held a playtest for this edition because what mearls said he wanted to do just sounded awful.
nope not speaking for anyone but myself here.
 

The fact is that 5e is the first edition that I havent bothered with buying anything are the 3 core books. SCA is ok I guess but I have only dmed so far. Im ok with players getting and using but none have so far. I make my own settings so Im not interested in the campaigns. Its not that Im against options. I own most books from all four previous editions, even going so far as to replace a bunch I lost in a flood years back. I just dont think their UAs are good. I see too many bad choices in their new stuff. The kensei is a perfect example, its really bad. Now I know the UAs are playtest material. I dont allow it in my games, but the forge cleric is not, and I just think that wizards has its priorities misplaced. Your right I dont have to purchase the new book and I probaably wont, but is losing my mony good for wizards? No, these coming years are the true test to see if this edition lasts or gets cut short like 4th.
Still speaking my opinion.
 

30 dollars? I spent hudreds to thousands of dollars on dnd. You need to stop blindly defending 5e. I have already acknowledged 5e has a great core product. 4e didnt feel like its core was complete until the phb2 came out with it missing half the cha pally and so many of what I consider core races. Im not dissing 5es foundation. Im discussing its future. And you should to with your eyes open. Most of theUAs have been poorly designed and not what alot of people are looking for. Was a forge cleric anywhere close to your top ten list of what 5e needs? Maybe they should be focusing more on psionics and planescape(although they did show us an early gith race). Honestly do we need more elf subraces? Arent they supposed to be along living but rare race? If you just blindly defend wizards, they will not put their best efforts inmaking new products.
here I state that they are poorly designed and not what alot of people are lookig for. This is your whole arguement that Im trying to speak for everyone? You are way worse in this thread making claims for others. Unless you show some real proof, Imdone with this. You have proven nothing. And now your just attacking me.
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top