Angel Tarragon
Dawn Dragon
Me too.Dog_Moon2003 said:Mmmmm, beef. And steak. And ribs. And hamburger. Crap, now I'm hungry.![]()
<wanders off into the kitchen to grab some grub>
Me too.Dog_Moon2003 said:Mmmmm, beef. And steak. And ribs. And hamburger. Crap, now I'm hungry.![]()
Originally posted by Dannyalcatraz
Go back to Henry's post (#23 in this thread)- there's a link that will tell you why. Basically, it boils down to a combination of hundreds of documented cases of severe burns caused by hotter than normal coffee (180+ deg. F as opposed to about 130 deg. F)...that McDonalds had settled before for between $10k-50k, an industry standard of generally not serving food hotter than 150 deg. F, and other factors.
In the eyes of the law, that's a pattern of releasing a defective product.
Originally posted by Naathez
What's always, REALLY puzzled me is who was the first man to sit behind a chicken and say "All right. Here goes nothing. I'm eating the first things that comes outta its..."
That's probably how cannibalism started too, now that I think of it.Ambrus said:I think people are perhaps missing the obvious, the members of our species didn't just go around carefully testing various materials to determine their edibility out of curiosity; they did it out of desperation.
Originally posted by Jdvn1
That's probably how cannibalism started too, now that I think of it.
There is only so much milk a human female can produce, though a group of human females can feed a child.Umbran said:Modern society, yes. But aside from the fact that we aren't talking about modern social mores, we're also talking about a society with much less wealth, and a greater need to exploit every source of nutrition it can. That social taboo seems like a weak impediment to experimenting with and developing a new food source.
Is cannibalism necessarily eating enemies?Dog_Moon2003 said:I thought cannibalism started more because people thought the essence of their enemies was trapped within their bodies and they thought that by eating the bodies, they would gain some of their strength or knowledge or something.
Of course I could be COMPLETELY off, but that's what I thought...
Originally posted by Jdvn1
Is cannibalism necessarily eating enemies?