I actually didn't know that; hence the question. Thank you, though, for pointing that out.Dalamar said:We've known for a while that the stat modifier listed next to the ability scores in the stat block (which are not the actual modifier, but the bonus it uses for things such as ability checks) are the old modifier (score/2-5) plus ½ the creature's level.
humble minion said:I do hope this is unrepresentative and that other epic monsters will have more imaginative power sets.
Fallen Seraph said:Also it becomes more menacing/interesting with how you describe it.
"The Phane dropped to its knees, its form beginning to flicker and ooze away into nothingness. When it vanished; all that could be seen or heard was the creak or armour and shuffling of feet as the party stood there alone.
What seemed like seconds passed, when the Phane appeared out of thin-air. Its form and shape restored to its previous form; the magical glyphs that were traced over its surface by the Cleric gone.
It swiped out with its shadowy claws, knocking down the Fighter as it seemed like days had passed without rest. It then instantly appeared behind the Wizard where its cloudy form engulfed him. As it settled away the Wizard lay on the ground ashen-faced and withered.
The Phane quickly moved away from the rest of the decimated party, its green eyes studying them; knowing what they will do next."
All that is within the rules of the Phane with using an action point.
GSHamster said:I think his job is to slow and stun the PCs, and let his brutes do the actual killing.
I agree. Since there are so many opinions on what is good fluff anyway, I think WotC should focus on the objective stuff. Besides, I think a bare bones description can be more evocative and suggestive than a long description. A short description sparks questions which gets the imagination going.Nymrohd said:Well it is not really their job to give such fluff; your DM is supposed to do it.