• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Mongol

You cannot view history through a modern lense nor expect historical personages to have had modern sensibilities.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Mark said:
You cannot view history through a modern lense nor expect historical personages to have had modern sensibilities.
QFT
Modern sensibilities are nothing but a veneer allowed by the plenty and order of a few regions of the planet. There are large parts of the world where such acts are still acceptable. And if you tear off the veneer you'd be surprised how quickly people can go right back to that state, because it's the natural state of the human animal. Always remember we are the most viciously effective pack predator the earth has ever seen. All our niceties are a sandcastle and they wash away very fast at need.
 

It is also worth noting that Ghengis Khan introduced the very first written language for the Mongols. Until that time, the Mongol's language was only spoken.
 

Back to the movie, saw it today.

It was very good- they do take some liberties with the history of Genghis as I've read it in different places, but given that there is no "definitive" history as such- nothing that has been thoroughly documented- this is somewhat forgivable.

The focus of the film is primarily on Temujin's relationship with his wife, Borte- and it provides the bulk of one of the movie's greatest deviances (an incident that I've never read or heard of). The ending comes rather abruptly, particularly in light of the length of this sequence, and it definitely is set up for the sequel that I have heard has already been shot.

Aside from those minor quibbles, however, the film is excellent. The cinematography is amazing, and really gives you a sense of the diverse geography of the Mongol steppes. The fight sequences are brutal- as you might imagine. They do a really good job of portraying different sides of Temujin, and all the performances were excellent.

If this movie is in your area, I highly recommend checking it out.
 

Mark said:
You cannot view history through a modern lense nor expect historical personages to have had modern sensibilities.
True. I don't really expect modern people to have so-called modern sensibilities either :)

Cthulhudrew said:
Back to the movie, saw it today.

It was very good...

Different strokes, I guess. I saw it last night and thought it was quite mediocre. The liberties they take with history didn't bother me at all, since I was expecting them. I just didn't think much of the acting and the storyline, for me, was fairly tedious. Temudgin came across as fairly dogged at best, and his achievements were almost always portrayed as the result of luck and the good will of others. And they seriously overdid the use of "Temudgin is captured and then escapes" sequences in the movie and shifted far too quickly from his tribulations to his success at the end. Unlike Cthulhudrew, I would not recommend the movie at all. I hope any later ones are better.
 

Just saw the movie. ....I need time to collect my thoughts and let the horror subside. For now, I'll just say I agree with Shilsen, and I cannot recommend this movie any longer. I feel like a kid who's baseball hero admitted to using steroids or something right now...
 

shilsen said:
And they seriously overdid the use of "Temudgin is captured and then escapes" sequences in the movie and shifted far too quickly from his tribulations to his success at the end.

I do think they went one of these sequences too far (the one that I'd never heard of that takes a fairly large sequence to play out), but otherwise, it is fairly accurate in terms of the actual history of Genghis as I've read it. He really did have some bad luck in regards to that sort of thing.

That said, I do agree that it would have been nice to see more of the Temujin-as-emerging leader sequences than we got, particularly in light of where they took the ending, but for all that, I still really enjoyed it.
 

StreamOfTheSky said:
...I need time to collect my thoughts and let the horror subside. For now, I'll just say I agree with Shilsen, and I cannot recommend this movie any longer.

Wow- that seems like a pretty extreme reaction. I'd be interested in hearing more of what you did/didn't like.
 

Well, it's hard to elaborate without spoilers. I will say the main thing was as Shilsen said. The blandness and sheer lack of acting. The whole movie was basically one event-->skip (possibly a few years)-->event-->skip, repeat ad nauseum. The plot, even though history provided such a rich framework to work with, was very thin, each strung along event very loosely tied together, and what should have been emotional scenes were entirely lacking. Jamuhka meets Temujin, and within one minute of film time, they're sitting by a camp fire, cutting their hands to become blood brothers. What?!

The film was supposed to be based around the relationship of Temujin and Borte, yet they spend very little time together, and when they are together, the conversation includes lines to the effect of "You will make a good wife." "Yes, I'll make a good wife." It's possible the translators just kept things basic so rabid "japanese is always better" type anime fanboys wouldn't scream bloody murder at them misinterpreting what was said, but...I hate it when subtitle writers play it safe like that.

Now some stuff that has to be in spoiler blocks:
[sblock]1. The way things were sped through was just so sloppy. At one point early on as a kid, he runs off to pray in a yoke, and then the next second he's out of the yoke. Is this him coming back later on once free? Towards the end, he basically leaves what seems to be his first bit of happiness the whole film, with his family, after havingn ot seen them for like ten years, riding off to basically bend all of the Mongols to his will for their own good. How wild-western. *eyeroll* Of course, the next scene is years later, the army having been assembled, and battle about to be joined. After the initial wave of the enemy is defeated, the rest charges, and a thunderstorm starts. All the Mongols cower out of fear, except our hero, who rouses his men to their feet. Instead of showing them winning, the filmaker just lets us assume they walked right over the huge enemy army, cutting to Temujin victorious. We don't even get to wait to the second film to see that smug Tangut ruler at his feet, the conquering of that area is covered with...a text description! Movie's over now, great ending, huh?

2. The portrayal of Borte, and how it affected his portrayal. Look, I knew his first child was likely not his, and she was raped by Merkits. But what the film did for the second child was just inexcuseable! It's implied that she sells her body to a merchant in order to ride to where her husband is held, to free him. Maybe the writers thought this would be a great show of devotion. To me, it just made her look like a whore, partly cause there was little to no anguish shown when she made the deal. Just a simple "you know what my payment will be," end scene. As for Temujin, he just looked so pathetic, riding away in the cart, as she said, "This is your daughter." Poor guy. Again, I wouldn't be so angry about it if it weren't for the fact this didn't actually happen, and the filmaker made a concious effort to put it in, because he thought it would improve the plotline. That's what makes me mad.

3. The whole Jamuhka thing. Not only was their meeting terse, later on, they fumbled the chance to show the emtional anguish as Temujin had to let him be executed (his wish), rather than let him live and join like he had wanted. Not only is this touching moment completely missing, they even decide to alter history and have Temujin let him run away! All I can say is, that better be for a dramatic scene in the next movie, but...since the end fast-forwarded past the point Jamuhka should have been killed, I doubt it.[/sblock]

For what I liked? The costumes were great, and while i'm not sure of the authenticity of the arms and armor the Mongols wore, it certainly looked cool. The battle scenes were great to watch when there was actual fighting. Well choreographed, and lots of blood. I said before, I'm in love with the soundtrack, and it was good in the movie. The backdrops and scenery were top notch, I probably could have sat there for two hours just looking at the pretty pictures.

Overall, on such a small budget, the movie was done very well, and I commend them for that. However, all these good points pale in comparison to the bad, and while this may actually be worthy of "mediocre" instead of outright terrible, I can't recommend it to anyone who isn't a diehard Genghis Khan fan. On the other hand, my fiance knew nothing about him before the movie and actually seemed to enjoy it more than me, so perhaps going in already knowing the history is a hindrance to enjoyment. Which...really isn't a good trait for a film based on historical characters and events...
 

I was quite looking forward to seeing Mongol, and I must say that the panoramic views of the steppes are impressive, but the battle scenes bothered me. They didn't demonstrate what the Mongols are known for.

The first problem, of course, was the relative dearth of mounted archers. Most of the combat was hand-to-hand, and much of it was on foot.

And what was the deal with the Mongol "ninjas" in the big battle, in masked helmets, riding out by themselves, holding twin scimitars?
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top