UngeheuerLich
Legend
So they are in good company, aren't they?So they are really late in changing the name.
So they are in good company, aren't they?So they are really late in changing the name.
That is because of your bias. If you look at without bias the obvious answer, if there is one, is different.This influence seems obvious to me.
For all we know that is how it is explained in the MM. I doubt, but we don't know yet. We will soon though!I'd say the messaging is weaker than the mechanic.
The designers chose to use, "Your PC has lost their feyness," as their messaging for the creature type change. As far as I'm concerned, that's a weak way to frame what they're doing.
The designers could have instead said, "There are plenty of humanoid creatures, all of whom appear in the NPC appendix. The rest of the book focuses on the most monstrous possible version of every listed creature." The average goblin in the woods is a Tribal Warrior. The archetypal monster goblin is a Fey with its own unique stat block, which it shares with no mere Humanoid.
To me, the latter framing of the rules change makes it sound way more awesome than WotC's wimpy "lost their feyness" framing.
They are not alone:So they are really late in changing the name
Feel free to think that. I like new monsters. What I don’t like is retroactively changing existing things.They are making new Fey monsters. The Archhag, a new Pixie and Satyr, a few more. You would know that if you actually watched the damn video instead of whining about it. The original Monster Manual was very lopsided in the amount of monsters in each creature type it had. Celestials, Fey, and Plants all had less than 10 monsters each. Dragons, Fiends, Monstrosities, and Humanoids all had dozens. They’re balancing out the lack of fey by making new fey options along with changing some of the older monsters in different creature types into fey (Centaurs, Goblinoids).
Didn’t you complain about how much WotC likes fey after Witchlight, Dragonlance, and Monsters of the Multiverse came out? I’m pretty sure if they had just added a ton of new fey to the Monster Manual instead of changing some you would be complaining about that.
Who's outraged.And let's not get into how, in BECMI the spell never interacted with alignment either.
Selective outrage.
The usual suspects.Who's outraged.
Alignment just needs to go.
I do miss alignment, but if you're going to insist it has to have more meaning than what cosmic team you've joined up with, I can take it or leave it.Or, it just needs to come back in full.![]()

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.