D&D 5E Monster Manual First Spoiler!

[Patrick McGill]

It's just art, but man that is a sexy dragon.

Source: https://www.facebook.com/dungeonsan...73340321070/10152574367296071/?type=1&theater

 

[Thaumaturge]

And it's a statement about metallic dragons.

Thaumaturge.

 

[doctorhook]

And it's a statement about metallic dragons.

Thaumaturge.

That they're in this one!

That's a copper. No word yet on the controversial "subs" in 4E's metallic dragon roster: iron dragons and adamantine dragons.

 

[odinist]

That's a damn good looking dragon.

 

[Psikerlord#]

That's a damn good looking dragon.

Awesome pic, I am by and large loving 5e art, woot!

 

[Mouseferatu]

That's a copper. No word yet on the controversial "subs" in 4E's metallic dragon roster: iron dragons and adamantine dragons.

Long as they didn't waste space that could've gone to real monsters with *choke* gem dragons, I'm fine with it.



*runs to don asbestos armor*

 

[Patrick McGill]

Honestly, being someone that loves a lot of the art in the PHB, I really can't wait to see the art treatment of that book being applied to the monsters.

This book is probably going to be gorgeous.

 

[Wolfskin]

Now that's one happy dragon! It makes me feel like smiling

 

[Ashr]

Sexy.

 

[doctorhook]

*gushing about gem dragons*

I love those guys! 3E kinda ignored them, and 4E skipped them altogether, IIRC. 5E needs to see the return of gem dragons!

...But I'm okay with waiting for the psionics book for 'em. Gem dragons need some good psionics rules.