Yeah, definitely not getting any good-vs-evil vibe from this squabble-by-proxy between ancient deities. They're mostly as bad as each other.Also, Khonshu is a real jerk.
Agreed. It's so obviously cruel and has the depth of a puddle. Steven could have cut it down a dozen different ways but we didn't have time for it so he picked dead kids to move things along.I did like Steven cutting to the chase in examining the implications of Ammit's methodology, and then taking a stand.
That remains to be seen. What does he consider to be evil deeds, and how does he punish them? I wouldn't be surprised if he's the "your crime is littering - the sentence is death!" type.I love how adamant Harrow was to defend the fact that he literally murders children (and babies, presumably) when Steven was taking the moral high ground. Khonshu might not be a good guy, but his way is certainly better than Mister Thoughtcrime.
This was the one part of the episode I didn't like. I felt like "Mr Thoughtcrime" who is going for diplomacy would try a bit harder to justify his position.I love how adamant Harrow was to defend the fact that he literally murders children (and babies, presumably) when Steven was taking the moral high ground. Khonshu might not be a good guy, but his way is certainly better than Mister Thoughtcrime.
Well, he basically did say that last episode. With the whole "if Ammit were in charge, Hitler never would have happened" speech in the museum. He didn't explicitly evoke the "I would murder Baby Hitler if given the chance," but it was pretty clear that's what he was talking about. I don't think it would really be necessary for him to say that again, especially because just a day has passed for Steven since he last talked with Harrow about this.This was the one part of the episode I didn't like. I felt like "Mr Thoughtcrime" who is going for diplomacy would try a bit harder to justify his position.
Something as simple as "If I knew, with 100% certainty, that the child next to me would become the next hitler. That a million people, and there million children, would die and suffer horribly at his hands....wouldn't it be murder not to stop him when I could?".... something like that. Keep in mind, several modern legal systems have tenants that if you have foreknowledge of a crime, and do nothing about it, you can have some liability.
Continuation: Ammit intending to consume all of humanity and thus prevent any human from ever sinning logically follows from the premises of Arthur's philosophy as expressed in this episode.Hypothesis: The reason that "a good man" registered thus in [Ethan Hawke]'s judgment is that he was [going to be] killed during Steven's escape, and so would not live long enough to sin.
Theory: Ammit intends to consume all humanity and thus prevent them from sinning. Whether [Ethan Hawke] knows this is not clear.