Seeten said:It doesnt out cleric the cleric. It out heals and out turns the cleric. It doesnt outfight the cleric. It doesnt outblast the cleric. It doesnt outlive the cleric.
Clerics have better hit die. Clerics have better BAB. Clerics thus fight much better, and tank much better than RSoP. Clerics Blast just as well. Clerics of Luck make saves better. Clerics of Destruction smite better.
I think people wildly overstate how good the RSoP is. Wildly.
Okay, so if we take into account your weak BAB house rule (the RSoP has median BAB, just like the cleric), the cleric takes the edge in melee combat when not using divine power. But nerfing a class and then stating that it's far weaker than people think isn't exactly fair game, especially on the rules forum.Seeten said:Perhaps I am at work and dont have my books here, but isnt RSoP 1/2 bab? If it isnt, it sure is in my campaign.
Book has 3/4 BAB, same as a cleric.Seeten said:Perhaps I am at work and dont have my books here, but isnt RSoP 1/2 bab? If it isnt, it sure is in my campaign.
Someone said:And Tempests give up nothing compared to a fighter. They gain everything a Fighter gets, and more. They become the ultimate two weapon fighters. If you have Improved two weapon fighting and spring attack, there's no reason not to take the Tempest class.
Which only serves to make my point stronger. Thanks. I was throwing the "RSoP = Cleric+" a bone, but if you don't want to do that, that's fine too.pawsplay said:And the answer is, "Every cleric of Pelor probably would take this class".
Um, no. Only ones who want to highly specialize in two things. As already pointed out, Healing is not a commonly taken domain. The costs to get in, while not odious, are not insignificant. I would agree with, "Every Cleric of Pelor, who has the Sun domain, who plans to specialize in healing, but who would rather have divine feats than Augmented Healing at lower levels, and has a decent Int score or is human... probably would take this class."