barsoomcore
Unattainable Ideal
Dinosaur geek steps in again....
More like a foot and a half. Still, I agree that they would be almost useless for most purposes. Certainly the animal could never wield a sword.rackabello said:If I remember rightly, Tyrannosaurus rex's arms were a teensy six inches long, which would make them very awkward to use for wielding weapons or tools that weren't specially designed for them.
I don't believe that theory has much to recommend it. You don't evolve powerful jaws, massive slicing teeth or flexed-knee leg structures built for very high speeds if you're going to just eat dead things. I've never seen any evidence to suggest that T. rex was primarily a scavenger. This animal was clearly built to attack and devour the large ceratopsians of its time.The small size of T. rex's arms is one of the arguments some have used in theorizing that the big dino may actually have been a scavenger.
That is a brilliant idea.Oh, and if you're keen to play a dinosaur bard, consider Parasaurolophus. Computer simulations suggest these swamp dwellers had lovely, trumpet like voices.