New Greyhawk Hardcover

[Mercule]

If the quality was in the league of the FRCS or ECS, I'd be all over a GCS.

As for what should be in the GCS: Mercenary neutrality, evil-hating neutrals, and a few dark and spooky places.

 

[Hjorimir]

Hi-

If it aint penned by Gygax, I will have no interest in buying a Greyhawk hardcover.


Scott

That's okay because I'd buy two.

 

[Remathilis]

I'll hold to being neutral: if they meant Greyhawk as in "pretty generic D&D setting with lots of old-fashioned nods and feel" I'm game. If they mean "Cram all of Greyhawks 30 year history down to the languages in a book" I'm less interested.

More D&D Gazetterr, Less Living Greyhawk Gazeteer.

 

[jokamachi]

Make it happen, Erik. Give us Greyhawk in all its windswept glory.

 

[jgbrowning]

Make it happen, Erik. Give us Greyhawk in all its windswept glory.

I'm telling you, Barbaric Yalps!

joe b.

 

[grodog]

If this is true, it would be great, and perhaps it could pave the way for some future GH products from WotC (real ones, not faux GH books like the original 3.0 AP modules).

 

[Nightfall]

So is Scarred Lands. In fact it's more dead because it doesn't even have the RPGA doing anything with it.

So? Does that make Ravenloft or the other TSR settings more dead? What about Arcanis? Freeport?

Joe,

Yeah well I'm sure it will be back. I won't let it die.

 

[Welverin]

If the quality was in the league of the FRCS or ECS, I'd be all over a GCS.

As for what should be in the GCS: Mercenary neutrality, evil-hating neutrals, and a few dark and spooky places.

Damn neutrals, never trust a bloody neutral, I always say.

 

[saucercrab]

Damn neutrals, never trust a bloody neutral, I always say.

Tell my wife I said, "Hello."

 

[Pants]

So? Does that make Ravenloft or the other TSR settings more dead?

It remains to be seen about Ravenloft, however, Birthright, Dark Sun, Jakandor, The Known World, etc. are pretty much as dead as dead can be.