D&D 5E (2024) New Jeremy Crawford Interviews


log in or register to remove this ad




The Dungeon Dudes' interview with Crawford was great. I haven't watched the other videos. While I have been disappointed by some of the changes and largely didn't think it went far enough to fix the game's problems, I am still interested in seeing some of the updates, especially the variety of small rule changes/codifications he talks about in the video.
 

The Pack Tactics video has a lot that's useful.


Awkward conversation, but the guy is having fun, and got JC to intro his channel, so that's pretty cool.

Questions were really focused on Backwards Compatibility, and the answers Crawford gave are all sensible and what I think we want to see:

  • subclasses not yet updated can be used with updated classes (PHB 2024 provides the chassis -- my word).
  • so when your class says you get a subclass feature, you get it and all the things of lower level that it would have given (so level 1-3 features of Forge Domain come online at level 3; as it should be).
  • previously published feats can be chosen at levels 4+ (including Tasha's feats).
  • races from before are usable as species if they've not been updated. That includes Half-Orc and Half-Elf (presumably, without ASI, since that now comes with Background; hinted at in this video starting around 3:05)
  • There's a note about Custom Lineage still being available, presumably with a second Origin feat (and not a general feat), but nothing in the interview as presented.
  • most recent version of something supersedes previous ones. (Note: interviewer doesn't ask about playing a Kobold, because he knows the answer is that the MotM version supersedes the Volo's [hence the name of his channel], and he prefers Volo's).

All in all really useful insights.
 
Last edited:


Yeah, but Smite was a Spell, that ran on Spell Slots. There were already other Smite Spella. This change juat makes sense.

From a mechanics perspective, it makes sense in that I understand how it works.

I wouldn't say that the current approach is the best approach though. 5e24 could have presented the paladin as something with its own identity by embracing more of what the paladin was already doing and taking steps to further differentiate the class rather than making it more like everything else.

Similarly, classes such as ranger and bard could have explored different ways of using their abilities.
 

presumably, without ASI, since that now comes with Background
The UA solution, which I have little doubt is what they will do here, is to choose to use the old Racial ASI or the new Background ASI. That prevents the old Race options that were on a different build type from most they made (really just Half-Elf and Mountain Dwarf) don't end up behind everyone else.
 

From a mechanics perspective, it makes sense in that I understand how it works.

I wouldn't say that the current approach is the best approach though. 5e24 could have presented the paladin as something with its own identity by embracing more of what the paladin was already doing and taking steps to further differentiate the class rather than making it more like everything else.

Similarly, classes such as ranger and bard could have explored different ways of using their abilities.
I mean, it sounds like they are exploring different ways of using their abilities...?

All three of those Classes are Spellcasters, so casting Spells is already in their balliwick.
 

Remove ads

Top