Ranger REG
Explorer
Unfortunately, that's true. Pissed me off that a lot of gamers think it's okay to have 3.5e in 2003 rather than 2005, and even after that, WotC keep changing the polymorph rules (back and forth and so on). Feel like I'm in a community of gullibles (along with pay-2-play MMORPGers and iPodders). :\Vigilance said:Some gamers wont.
However, past experience from other game companies like GURPs (4 editions in 20 years), White Wolf (4 editions in 15 years) and WOTC (a few years between 3.0 and 3.5, a similarly short turnaround between editions of Star Wars) has shown most gamers DO upgrade.
You get a few early adopters, they evangelize the system, convert some more in their local circle and then the social network tugs almost everyone else along.
You will always lose some customers, but the net result tends to be a nice profit surge to the company making the game.
It's no accident that everyone does business this way.
Go ahead, people, keep reinforcing my belief that humaniti still disappointingly suck as a whole.
I just hope that WotC or future publisher of D&D is not going to adopt the GURPS model.Vigilance said:If it didn't work, don't you think people would stop doing it? D&D had traditionally had about a 10 year edition cycle. But with GURPs and White Wolf proving customers were ok (as a whole) with a 4-5 year edition cycle, what are they supposed to do?
I just hope oldie and newbie D&D gamers are going to tell WotC to stop reinventing the wheel every 3 years or so.