D&D 4E No d100 in 4e?

[Umbran]

The number of desired outcomes does not really have much to do with it, Umbran.

I noted the die roll needed more outcomes, not the game effect needed more outcomes.

 

[TwinBahamut]

I wouldn't mind seeing that cumbersome type of dice roll get removed from the game. I would much rather see d12s than d100s.

 

[Kaodi]

Hmmm... Sorry for jumping on you like that then. Crazy top-down cognitive bias...

 

[Lord Xtheth]

What I would like to see in D&D is a fully laid out 100 option table where the D100 is used to its full potential...

or maybe weapons that deal D100 damage... that would be funny!

 

[AFGNCAAP]

I really wouldn't be surprised if the d100 is relegated purely to being a "DM's die" in 4e. It could also work for quick-gen charts for anyone (character names, background, etc.).

Then again, there's a part of me that would like to see the mighty d30 come into use in the game & get some love, somehow.

 

[Sir Brennen]

It's been gone for players since 3E. Every percentage you speak of only has increments of 5, and thus was just as easy to roll on a d20.

Heck, in our games now, things like "miss chance 50%" end up being determined with a d6 half the time anyway.

 

[see]

What they need to do is add more dice. The possibilities of the d16, d24, and d30 have been sadly neglected for far, far too long. (1d16+2 ability score generation!)

 

[ZappoHisbane]

Then again, there's a part of me that would like to see the mighty d30 come into use in the game & get some love, somehow.

Random starting character level?

 

[Kaodi]

Or a mercury filled d1000... hehehe...

 

[Fieari]

I love my d30 and contrive to use it whenever possible.

My d100 though? Not so much love. It's too lightweight and takes forever to stop rolling... it's like a hollow golf ball! Make that thing bigger and give it some heft and I'd love to use it more.

2d10 as a pseudo d100? Meh. I'd rather roll a d20.