Ugh, I forgot about this thread. Replies forthcoming!
Trainz said:
I am perfectly OK with it too, I don't really care, but I fully understand where the nitpickers are coming from. If you accept that premise, than you state that Halfling smiths only make weapons for medium size creatures, not for themselves... it's a weird premise.
No, it doesn't imply that. Halfling smiths make all sorts of weapons sized for halflings -- but a halfling longsword just acts in all ways like a human shortsword, and a halfling spear acts just like a human shortspear.
This is really not a strange concept. There are material and balance* considerations to take into account when you change sizes like that. You can't just produce something that looks like a shrunk-down longsword, because it would be too thin to withstand normal use. You can't make a shrunk-down longbow because the cross-section of the wood is critical to being able to flex properly. You can't shrink a polearm at all without losing the reach that the long pole gives you, which is rather the point of making a polearm at all.
In other words, a halfling smith making a "longsword" would make something much thicker and stubbier-looking than a human longsword -- it would, in fact, look almost exactly like a human shortsword, because a shortsword (gladius, whatever) is shaped not for size of the hand-grip, but to do the job of cutting things on a battlefield.
The point is, a "halfling weapon" should be, at the very most, a question of replacing the grip with something sized more appropriately to their hands.
*The "center of gravity" kind of balance, not game balance.