D&D General Nolzur creates inclusive miniatures, people can't handle it.

[Umbran]

100% agree... not what I said though, was it?

Maybe you didn't realize it, but yeah, you kinda were saying that. It is implied by the construction.

 

[MGibster]

Let's see you fight a Kodiak from standing. Pretty sure the result would be the same...

It's honestly how I want to go.

 

[Gradine]

 

[Alzrius]

It's honestly how I want to go.

If it's good enough for Brad Pitt, it's good enough for anyone.

 

[BrokenTwin]

Sounds like a good time to me.

--------------

I run into verisimilitude issues with dungeon delvers in wheelchairs, because I tend to picture run-down ruins with walls to scale and rubble to squeeze through that aren't exactly wheel-friendly. But ultimately I'm not going to yuck anybody's yum over it. It's an exceedingly minor nitpick for me in the grand scheme of things.

 

[Clint_L]

I run into verisimilitude issues with dungeon delvers in wheelchairs, because I tend to picture run-down ruins with walls to scale and rubble to squeeze through that aren't exactly wheel-friendly. But ultimately I'm not going to yuck anybody's yum over it. It's an exceedingly minor nitpick for me in the grand scheme of things.

This is fair. I just make the wheelchairs magic. Basically, the same way the X-Men writers started treating Prof. X's wheelchair. It's a handwave solution that gets the job done. And when they players want more verisimilitude, they add it.

 

[Ulorian - Agent of Chaos]

Maybe you didn't realize it, but yeah, you kinda were saying that. It is implied by the construction.

Sorry, just saw this, been a busy day. It was not implied by the construction. It would be more correct to say that it was an inference, based on personal experiences. I get that, and am extremely sympathetic to these situations. I'll also add that injustices, of any colour, get up my nose. When I see them, I do my best to rectify them. I don't advertise it, I don't do it for the likes. I do it with considering the thoughts, intentions and feelings of both parties. I do it with respect. There is such a thing as believing the world can be a better place and using your power as an individual to do so.

But please try to understand the point I was making without assigning intent based on an inference that you made, based on your personal experience.

 

[MGibster]

run into verisimilitude issues with dungeon delvers in wheelchairs, because I tend to picture run-down ruins with walls to scale and rubble to squeeze through that aren't exactly wheel-friendly. But ultimately I'm not going to yuck anybody's yum over it. It's an exceedingly minor nitpick for me in the grand scheme of things.

Something broke inside me not too long ago and I've come to the conclusion that D&D, like Camelot, 'tis a silly place. I've learned the game is best enjoyed by leaning into the D&Disms which means I don't sweat the little things like the economy, how many arrows a PC is carrying, trifling matters like physics, or people in wheelchairs engaging in sword fighting, wizardry, or thieving shenanigans.

 

[Scott Christian]

I want you to know that I mean absolutely no offense when I say this, but this is unbelievably naive. At the very least when we're talking about the internet, no, at least 90% of the time it is malice, it's just not usually not so obvious as it was here.

I would just ask that you frame that a little differently. It is malice 90% of the time, on sites you visit. Remember, you, me, and everyone here gets our own little personal world thanks to machine behind our keyboard.