Once More Into the Breach: Lawsplainer on Legal Text, Annotated

[Snarf Zagyg]

EDIT - I will get around to reading that 30 page document. Eeeeeventually

Now, be thankful for how SHORT my posts are!

 

[Ryujin]

Now, be thankful for how SHORT my posts are!

I've read the Ontario Highway Traffic Act, front to back, along with many of the ancillary acts when occasion required. I occasionally search for cases on CanLii, for fun. You posts ARE short. It just takes a certain headspace to wade into Constitutional analysis

 

[Snarf Zagyg]

I've read the Ontario Highway Traffic Act, front to back, along with many of the ancillary acts when occasion required. I occasionally search for cases on CanLii, for fun. You posts ARE short. It just takes a certain headspace to wade into Constitutional analysis

Just wait for me to pivot to video.... those youtubers aren't ready for a REAL Snyder Cut.

Is there a maximum time limit for a youtube video? Asking for a friend.

 

[Snarf Zagyg]

Given that there were two likes to the OP, and the only comments on the thread were about the Oxford comma (not there's anything wrong with that ... I don't kink shame), I'm going to ask if people want me to continue this series, or just let it go the way of the streamer power rankings?

 

[Ryujin]

I quite enjoy the intellectual exercise but if you aren't getting what you want out of it, the obvious thing to do is move on.

 

[Dannyalcatraz]

Given that there were two likes to the OP, and the only comments on the thread were about the Oxford comma (not there's anything wrong with that ... I don't kink shame), I'm going to ask if people want me to continue this series, or just let it go the way of the streamer power rankings?

You do you!

But not every legal lesson is enthralling, even to we who passed the bar. I mean, I was one of very few people in my section who grokked the Rule Against Perpetuities the first time through. And when others asked me to explain it, I could see the eyes of several of them just glaze right over.

 

[Snarf Zagyg]

You do you!

But not every legal lesson is enthralling, even to we who passed the bar. I mean, I was one of very few people in my section who grokked the Rule Against Perpetuities the first time through. And when others asked me to explain it, I could see the eyes of several of them just glaze right over.

I tell ya, we gotta bring back the fee tail.

As for RAP? THE HEIR CANNOT BE ASCERTAINED!

 

[Dannyalcatraz]

I tell ya, we gotta bring back the fee tail.

As for RAP? THE HEIR CANNOT BE ASCERTAINED!

Word to the testator!

 

[Snarf Zagyg]

I quite enjoy the intellectual exercise but if you aren't getting what you want out of it, the obvious thing to do is move on.

I want the same thing we all want ...

Or maybe ... it is better to be feared than loved? Eh, who knows. Anyhoo, I am putting a short piece up for now and taking a hiatus, although if there are sufficient questions (and the undying love and/or fear of everyone) I might post an answer thread.

Snarf's Unwarranted Repose- Lazy Law Explained Badly

I am taking a short break from the law-like substance posts. So, I will leave you in the meantime with two things; a brief legal concept, poorly explained. And a request for feedback. If you post a legal-y question below (subject to the terms and conditions at the end of this post), I may answer...

www.enworld.org

 

[Nylanfs]

Note: I enjoy almost everything you post on legal issues.