Only the Lonely: Why We Demand Official Product

  • Thread starter Thread starter lowkey13
  • Start date Start date

log in or register to remove this ad

You should by a WotC version, then.

Page 32. "...others form the ranks of soldiers in great wars..."

Form THE ranks. Not some ranks. Not a few ranks. But THE ranks, which means all the ranks for the great war. Great war. Not skirmish. Not battle. Not normal war. Not small war. GREAT war.

That's a very big leap of logic. From the ranks could be a couple of thousand.
 








Doesn't make 2000 great, though. You can see great armies that number in 10's and hundreds of thousands in the middle ages and earlier.

China had a 12,000 man army in 2000BC. Egypt an army of 100,000 in 1250BC. Persia had 500,000 in 600BC. 2000 was pocket change.

Book just says from the ranks. You can have a smallish standing army and still recruit from the ranks.

You can often accomplish a lot with relatively few men.

Hasting. About 5000 on each side, William takes England.

Arabs pushing out of Arabia. Maybe had as few as 13000 men initially.

A few thousand raiders out if Afghanistan establish the Murghal Empire.

I think our army is around 2000, in WW2 we mobilised 100k. You can still go through the ranks at 2000.

They could still fight as mercs in great wars. It's independent of their numbers. The Swiss for example not many if them still fought in great wars.
 

Remove ads

Top