Raging Epistaxis said:
Besides - I dislike playing interPC conflict, especially when starting out.
Well,
a little bit of conflict is always fun.
On that note, I would like to mention that in the upcoming campaign, I was hoping to play Kenneth a certain way, and I wanted to check with you guys first to make sure everyone would be okay with it.
Kenneth is smart and charismatic, but thinks he's smarter and more charismatic than he actually is. He's always honest, but might exaggerate his knowledge, make wrong interpretations, and oftentimes miss the point. He won't really
do anything stupid, but might say plenty of stupid things. Feel free to roleplay groans, sighs and rolling of eyes.
Hopefully, though, he'll contribute plenty of useful insights and have opportunities to help the party. He might needlessly relate an epic tale about a magic item found. But that tale might include a line or two that helps identitfy the item's properties, without Kenneth realizing it (although another character would). Or, expounding on the fascinating properties or nuances of a puzzle, inadvertantly give a clue as to the solution.
So, now that I have imitated Kenneth in giving a longwinded explanation for a truly simple concept, if you guys don't like this idea, or get tired of my posts, please let me know and I will tone it back a bit.
