OotS 406

What an awesome strip! And a perfect example why I normally don't allow paladins in my games. They tend to slip from Lawful Good to Lawful Idiotus very quickly and do stupid things like this, and I already have enough NPCs as it is.

I have to say, for all the light-hearted tone this strip normally has, this has been a deeply complex storyline that I am eagerly looking forward to see develop. Great job, Rich!
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Storm Raven said:
Are ou sure they don't have that right? Are you certain that the head of the Sapphire Order doesn't have the power to render judgments? Are you certain that Roy's father, who answered the summons for a celestial, is not capable of rendering such a judgment? Shojo didn't hand pick Roy's father, he showed up when the priests requested a celestial.

If they have that right, there's no need for deception. In any event, there can be no doubt that having the accused's father serving as the jury cannot be considered impartial.

But I will accept that something is seriously out of joint here - Roy's father isn't Lawful, and doesn't seem particularly Good. Therefore, his answering a call for a Lawful Good celestial doesn't fit. (Although, don't the Fiendish Codices make mention of Lower Planar powers sometimes hijacking such summons, much as Roy's father was seen to do? If so, it stands to reason that a Chaotic Good power could do likewise.)

Shojo could not have done that for two reasons. He feared (probably correctly) that Roy, without the background information provided at the trial about the snarl, and the prodding from his dead father, would simply ignore the message.

With input from Roy's father, he could almost certainly have phrased the message such that it wouldn't have been ignored. Or, just have Miko ask Roy really nicely (although, to be fair, Shojo couldn't have known about that reaction on Roy's part). Or don't send Miko with a message - call another Celestial and send it with the message. Or just hire someone else entirely.

Remember, the only way to provide the "state secret" about the snarl to Roy and company was to have them demand it at the trial.

Since Shojo obviously doesn't consider himself bound by the oath not to meddle in the other gates, he almost certainly doesn't consider himself bound to keep the state secret. As such, there is absolutely nothing him just telling Roy when they're in private... much like the way he asks the OotS to look in on the other gates.

In any event, relying on Roy demanding the 'state secret' at the trial makes for a really sucky plan. What if Miko had 'accidentally' killed him? What if he'd decided not to cooperate? What if he mounted some other form of defence? What if they'd escaped?

Furthermore, the paladins of the Sapphire Order are prevented by their oaths from seeking out the other gates, and preventing others from doing so, which means that Miko could not carry the message to Roy in the first place.

Miko does not need to be told the content of the message. Furthermore, the message to be delivered can be nothing more than "Azure City desperately need your help in a noble endeavour. Will pay lot$". This (by itself) hardly violates the paladin oath, and it's no more a manipulation of Miko than is sending her out to recruit the OotS via a show trial.

But Shojo was not the only one presenting the prosecution. Hence, he didn't control the flow of information. If there was more evidence, it would have been brought forward at trial. That's why we have trials.

That, I believe, is my point exactly. Suppose the prosecution had presented some piece of information Shojo hadn't been aware of. For example, "Roy Greenhilt's father swore an oath of loyalty to the lich Zykon binding unto the seventh generation."

Now, what would the outcome of the trial have been in that scenario? Will the verdict be guilty or not-guilty?

It has, by everyone at this point except Miko and Hinjo. And even Hinjo seems to think that there is a need for a trial to determine Shojo's guilt, so he's not entirely on the "no justice" wagon. And in their position, they could have been shown (had Miko been willing to listen) that justice had actually been done, resolving the problem. Of course, Miko didn't care whether justice was actually done or not, her statements and actions clearly show that.

I agree with most of this. There did indeed need to be a trial of Shojo, putting him up on the charge of "perverting the course of justice". A charge of which he is guilty. And then he should be removed from power.

By summarily executing him, Miko has rendered a public enquiry impossible, and prevented the damage caused being fixed.

Because it was the only way to get the OotS to the Sapphire City, get them the secret information about the snarl and the other gates, and convince them to do what he needed them to do. Shojo explained all of this about a hundred fifty strips ago.

A way, certainly. The only way? Hardly. Just because Shojo is so used to manipulating everyone as a matter of course, and so couldn't see a means that didn't involve such manipulation, doesn't mean that no such means exists.
 

orsal said:
How would you explain that, in light of the past 406 strips?
[sblock=elaboration]I thought Belkar's evilness was apparent beginning when he was unaffected by the Unholy Blight spell. More recently, we've seen time and again that he likes killing people just for the XP. I don't think there's any doubt about Belkar's alignment.[/sblock]

[SBLOCK]Belkar is evil, but does not mind lieing to the paladin to deny it. If her smite evil does not work because she fell then he could opportunistically claim that as proof, just to set her off more and mess with her more. Although I think his character would more probably say something like "Wait. It didn't work? Ha, ha, ha, you fell off your high horse!"[/SBLOCK]
 

To be honest, I didn't care for the ruler of this town or Miko, so I didn't like the last strip.

On the other hand, I did think it was funny that Elan's friend blasted all the catapaults one day before the city gets invaded.

Furthermore, it does look like Belkar will get to kill Miko or Miko's horse.
 

Nyeshet said:
So, Miko had - from his own lips - an unknowing confession that he had staged a false trial. That was the only crime she had heard (as the other matters were matters of honor, not law: not seeking out or investigating other Gates, not lying to the Paladins of the Sapphire Guard).

She also heard Roy noting -- and Shojo agreeing -- that their plan involves something that the Sapphire Guard oath forbids. If you overheard that, without knowing the context, what would be your guess?
 

Storm Raven said:
Why not? Are they incapable of evaluating the correct legal outcome of a proceeding? They used Roy's dad because he was on hand and they needed him to bring Roy on board to accomplish the actual goal of hauling the OotS to Sapphire City - investigating the other gates. If Shojo didn't want that, it seems pretty obvious that he wouldn't have bothered to send Miko to get OotS in the first place, and thus there would have been no trial at all.

Nope. Completely false.

Roy's dad used them. They just agreed with Roy's dad's plan.

delericho said:
The situation is exactly analogous to a judge hand-picking the jury in a trial to ensure the result he wants... whether the right result comes about or not, the system is still corrupt.

No. The situation isn't that at all. It's rather a case of a juror handpicking the court where he'll do his duty. Again, Shojo DIDN'T make Roy's dad come, it's Roy's dad who imposed his presence.
 
Last edited:

Gez said:
No. The situation isn't that at all. It's rather a case of a juror handpicking the court where he'll do his duty. Again, Shojo DIDN'T make Roy's dad come, it's Roy's dad who imposed his presence.

Shojo could have refused to go along with Roy's Dad's plan, and called another Celestial. Indeed, since there was considerable time between Roy's Dad first approaching Shojo and the trial actually taking place, there was similarly plenty of time for Shojo to deal with the situation. There had to be two summons - the first where Roy's Dad first appeared, and then the second for the trial itself. To get Roy's Dad for the trial, the second calling probably had to be of him by name... which suggests choice on the part of Shojo.
 

delericho said:
Shojo could have refused to go along with Roy's Dad's plan, and called another Celestial. Indeed, since there was considerable time between Roy's Dad first approaching Shojo and the trial actually taking place, there was similarly plenty of time for Shojo to deal with the situation. There had to be two summons - the first where Roy's Dad first appeared, and then the second for the trial itself. To get Roy's Dad for the trial, the second calling probably had to be of him by name... which suggests choice on the part of Shojo.


There was only one summons. Roy dad couldn't return because he'd have toe xplain to the celestial host why he had tied up the true envoy (bob IIRC). The father and Shojo say it at some point after the trial.
 


Elf Witch said:
I disagree. There is an evil army at that gates. If these people were evil and involved then it would be dangerous and stupid to leave them around so th they could may escape from their cells and open the gates to allow the evil hoard in.

If there was no army at the gates then yeah I could see taking them in and throwing them in a cell and having a trial.

So in other words, paladins get to murder whoever they want to so long as there's an imminent threat on the horizon.

And given how fungible the definition of "imminent threat" is, you're basically saying that paladins can murder whoever they want to, whenever they want to.

Before we go any further in this discussion, why don't you tell us exactly what you think it takes for a paladin to fall. That would be extremely helpful.
 

Remove ads

Top