I'm A Banana
Potassium-Rich
How often does the chinese zodiac get to order take out on someone's paladinhood?
Indeed, I think a lot of Azure City has shown us just how well you can blend the Asian and European motifs in D&D....

How often does the chinese zodiac get to order take out on someone's paladinhood?
People, IMO, just have to realise that it is a comic. It does not have to follow the rules of d&d or the zodiac to be funny.Whizbang Dustyboots said:Clearly it does to him.
So someone WAS nearly that silly, in other words.Felix said:[sblock]There was an argument on a thread a while ago which weighed morality based upon intent, act and consequence. Some held that an act was evil if the intent and the act were evil, others discounted intent and held consequences to be of the most import. One example given was a woodsman cutting down a tree which fell upon, and killed, a child. The "consequence basis of morality" held that because an evil result came from cutting down the tree, then the action of cutting was evil.
In this strip, the consequence of Shojo dying does not occur until after the withdrawl of grace, so it is not his death that makes Miko's act evil. This strip seems to support the argument that intent and action are the more important factors in determining an action's morality.[/sblock]
Hussar said:IIRC, isn't the punishment death? That might give Belkar some pause.
ForceUser said:I enjoy the juxtaposition between poorly-roleplayed paladin (Miko)...
Pbartender said:Judgement without thought,
Sepia tone samurai.
Repentant? Fallen.
Nifft said:Miko and Belkar are an interesting contrast: they're both fueled by anger and resentment, but Belkar knows and embraces the dark origin of his motivation... while I think Miko has just realized it for the first time.
It'll be interesting to see what she does with this knowledge.
Cheers, -- N