Xykon is unlikely, since all this was about assuming Shojo was working for him. In her twisted mind, Roy and Shojo are in cahoots with him, she's not about to go working for him just because her Paladin's License had "Revoked" stamped on it by her entire pantheon at once.Olgar Shiverstone said:Yay, lay down the godsmack! How's it feel to be a fighte3r without feats? get 'er, Belkar!
Sad about Shojo, though.
Edit: So what are my odds on Miko joining either Xykon or the Linear Guild?
Actually a Good character would hold the bizarre fluke against themself and try to make amends for it even though they did not intend for such to happen.jeffh said:The view is (most plausibly) based on the reasonably expected consequences of one's actions; you don't hold bizarre flukes against someone.
The color completely makes this one.Hypersmurf said:Must slay the traitor!
I know what Shojo's up to!
Killing him solves...
Oops.
-Hyp.
That's a fine way to read it. But it's also fair to acknowledge that Miko is despised by many readers (myself included) because she has embodied what is frustrating about poorly-RPed paladins for many D&D fans -- the arrogance and high-handedness and so on. I've often felt that to RP a paladin well, one must start with humility. That's the archetype in my mind, the humble pious knight. And while there are a thousand valid deviations from the archetype, I read Hinjo as a fulfillment of it, and Miko as the antithesis that drives frustrated DMs to ban paladins from their games.Plane Sailing said:FWIW I would consider Miko to be a particularly well-roleplayed paladin. I would admire and encourage a player who managed to act out a role of a PC on the edge, teetering and tottering towards it, rather than just automatically filling the cookie-cutter role that might be expected of them.
Cheers