Party Choices...

[Erekose]

I voted for jello, on the broad assumption that jello is American for English jelly, and who doesn't like jelly?

I always thought jello was non-sweet jelly . . .

I went for the standard four the game was designed around - sometimes simple is best.

 

[Ilium]

What Felix said. I would like to do a stealth-themed party, but you can easily achieve that without completely losing spellcasting ability. One or two levels of rogue can make a sorcerer or wizard quite stealthy (no annoying armor) plus all those good magical stealth enhancements like Invisibility and Silence spells.

 

[Nifft]

I'd have picked 'Stealthy' but I can't abide monks.

Okay, so tell us what you can abide.

-- N

PS: From poll results, jello is clearly broken.

 

[Bront]

All Ooze party! Go Jello!!!

 

[JRRNeiklot]

Barbarian, ranger, cleric, wizard, but not the crappy 3.5 ranger.

 

[Tiberius]

For reference, this is Jello:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gelatin_dessert

 

[ThirdWizard]

Fab 4 all the way.

I love to play theme groups and off the wall parties, but not the same ones repeatedly. The balanced party never gets old to me.

 

[trancejeremy]

What, no option for pudding pops?

 

[Michael Morris]

3d6 in order. let the each player decide what they want to play.

and roll with it.

i like jello

I absolutely refuse to play under any DM that uses that method since I had a DM insist I play a character that didn't have a score over 7. And he only had one 7.

 

[Terwox]

An all stealth party sounds like a blast to play in.

Normally I'd just say the default four though -- lemme play the cleric, you guys play the fighter, thief, and mage.