Tony Vargas
Legend
Certainly none with, well, classes. PF1, and, D&D in general, has tended to heavily favor caster classes, 3.5, "Tier 1" was held by the Wizard, Cleric, and Druid.Yeah I am really trying to figure out their point when I have never come across any RPG ruleset ever that has every class being balanced and equally competent.
Interestingly, while 3.0 wasn't that different from 3.5, I do recall the 3.0 Fighter making a bit of a splash for being so new & different, getting feats, and the game including more combat maneuvers. It didn't last long and "Fighter SUX" threads became a fixture on the old D&D boards. When 4e first came out, there was an initial a hue & cry over the wizard being 'nerfed,' that subsided as it became clear that, in spite of all the new toys the fighter had gotten, and all the cuts to the wizard, the wizard was still the most versatile, most abuseable class in the game.
Maybe this kerfuffle is going to go the same way? After some initial hand-wringing over the wizard not being /as/ OP in quite the same ways as its Tier 1 3.5/PF tenure, the merits of the current incarnation of the class will become more clear?