Henry
Autoexreginated
Nifft said:Isn't Sorcerer kinda core?![]()
Yep. I'd love a good alternative for a wizard that's WotC-produced, ans some have given me some ideas already, but any others are welcome.
What's wrong with Rogue and Fighter? I'm not saying it's terrible to exclude them, but I don't see any reason to do so.
That stems from the "...my idea is to use classes my group doesn't use much, and still cover all typical party roles" part of the experiment. I don't want to drown 'em in choices, but also want to give them enough to be happy with.
Binder should be in, but with a moderate power-up. Incarnum stuff should be in.
None of us own the Incarnum book, and I've never really dug into them. What would be their power on a scale of "Warlock" to "Druid/Cleric", and are they rules-problematic?
Dragon Shaman (from PHB-II) is encounter-based, and does a fine job of replacing the Bard.
I think I'm becoming sold on the four PHB2 classes, especially since I forgot the Shaman is encounter-based...
Dragonfire Adept (from Dragon Magic) is a nice Warlock variant.
One of the group has this one -- I need to borrow it and check this one out.
Keep 'em comin', y'all!