Hella_Tellah
Explorer
...Penny Dreadful, the Mistress of Pulp Fiction(s).
That's awesome!
...Penny Dreadful, the Mistress of Pulp Fiction(s).
And he was a terrific character. More importantly, he was proof that almost any character concept can work when they're played well, even one that's jokey/deliberately comedic.Having said that, I have played a character who described himself as "a great lover of women ... and pretty good lover of men" and fancied himself as the world's greatest lover.
One of my players is annoyed/just doesn't understand why anyone would WANT to. He even goes so far as to question why anyone would do so for a computer game, where you have the option.
I don't know; do I personally desire to be a murderer that kicks in the door and slaughters people?An RL RPG is where you envision yourself as the character. You are ROLE playing. Unless there's some impotent desire to see yourself as the opposite gender, then I don't see why anyone would roleplay as such.
Perhaps I should have said "irrationally enrages me"Why? I'm not trying to open a can of worms, but there is more to the aesthetics of human (or, in this case, humanoid) anatomy in art than sexuality. Historically speaking, women are more popular than men as art subjects, in part because of traditional views of idealized gender roles ("soft" subjects are aesthetically pleasing, while "hard" subjects are not). According to enculturated-lens theory, the "idealized" male form (and the one used in most MMO's for male characters) is one of action and a sort of brutishness, and almost grotesque musculature. And yet, these are the sorts of characteristics that are not considered aesthetically pleasing to the vast majority of either men or women.
It has almost nothing to do with "getting one's jollies."
That's a nice, concise description.I don't care if anyone plays the opposite gender, but if you're just going to use it as an outlet for your frustrated sexual urges, take a hike.