D&D (2024) Playtest 6 Survey is Open

[UngeheuerLich]

Oh crap! I finished the survey last night and I just remembered I wanted to recommend adding WIS modifier to the Monk's Discipline Points

I try to remember that and add that you thought the same.

 

[Gladius Legis]

So apparently WOTC is intentionally limiting feedback on the Ranger compared to all other classes. They don't even let you rate and comment on the Ranger subclasses, and you only get 200 words on the Ranger compared to 500 for everyone else. LOL, WOTC really does hate Rangers.

 

[Maxperson]

I let them know in no uncertain terms just what I thought about turning paladin smite into a spell.

 

[Charlaquin]

So apparently WOTC is intentionally limiting feedback on the Ranger compared to all other classes. They don't even let you rate and comment on the Ranger subclasses, and you only get 200 words on the Ranger compared to 500 for everyone else. LOL, WOTC really does hate Rangers.

Huh? I had the option to rate and comment on the ranger subclasses…

 

[TerraDave]

Huh? I had the option to rate and comment on the ranger subclasses…

As did I. It seemed to be less detail. But it wasn't just the ranger...some places they wanted more point by point comparisons then others.

 

[UngeheuerLich]

I let them know in no uncertain terms just what I thought about turning paladin smite into a spell.

You think it is great?

 

[Gorck]

One thing I don't like about these surveys is the vagueness of some questions. For example, they have us rate "Spellcasting." What about spell casting am I rating? How the slots are doled out? Spells Known vs Spells Prepared? Class Lists vs Arcane/Divine/Primal? Full caster vs Half Caster vs Pact Magic? Those are all vastly different mechanics that fall under "Spellcasting" in their survey, but I have different opinions on each one.

I like the Spell Slot progression and Spell Preparing for the Druid and Cleric, but I hate the Divine & Primal spell lists and would prefer they reverted back to class lists, so I don't know whether to rate it Dissatisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Mostly Satisfied, or Very Satisfied (or whatever the options were called). I can specify my critique in the boxes, but it's that initial rating that will contribute to whether or not it will make the 70% mark.

 

[Charlaquin]

As did I. It seemed to be less detail. But it wasn't just the ranger...some places they wanted more point by point comparisons then others.

Yeah, they gave the opportunity for point-by-point feedback on new subclasses and subclasses like the Way Warrior of the Elements monk that were completely-written, but not on revised versions of existing subclasses (and all of the ranger subclasses were of the latter variety).

 

[TerraDave]

Yeah, they gave the opportunity for point-by-point comparisons on new subclasses and not on revised versions of existing subclasses (and all of the ranger subclasses were of the latter variety).

The elemental monk? Of course the land-druid, so at least for some pre-existing ones, maybe with the biggest known issues, they did also have point by point.

 

[Charlaquin]

The elemental monk? Of course the land-druid, so at least for some pre-existing ones, maybe with the biggest known issues, they did also have point by point.

Yeah, I remembered those after hitting submit and edited my post. The subclasses that were completely re-written also had the opportunity for point-by-point feedback.