Your deflect attacks was a change to a proposal to give the monk the ability to use Patient Defence as a reaction for 1 discipline point.Deflect Missiles is against 1 attack.
Idk what you are responding to. I posited replacing patient defense with deflect attacks. What’s that got to do with the difference between patient defense and shield?
I do not see "Deflect Attacks" as a good substitution for a reaction based Patient defence ( at the cost of a reaction and a discipline point).For Patient Defense, I like changing it to a reaction, but remember reactions need a trigger to be used, and timing ought to be figured out. So, I'd guess the intent that you can react to being attacked. So it'd be:
Patient Defense: When you are targeted by a (melee?) attack, you can spend one Discipline Point as a reaction to take the Dodge action.
IMO…at that point why not just make deflect missiles into deflect attacks?
My rewrite gives at-will usage of some kind to nearly all base class “ki” features in the phb. So, patient defense has no focus cost and still uses a BA, and im considering having it give DR rather than imposing disadvantage. That way, it also makes deflect attacks work more reliably, and ties the two together.Your deflect attacks was a change to a proposal to give the monk the ability to use Patient Defence as a reaction for 1 discipline point.
I do not see "Deflect Attacks" as a good substitution for a reaction based Patient defence ( at the cost of a reaction and a discipline point).
Though, now that I think about it a "Deflect Attacks" at just the cost of a reaction is pretty good also. Why not both.
The claim is being made (which I largely agree with) is that the Monk could do with more options.
At the levels we are talking about that is like 5 10 minute uses a day. Not that limited.That is not a barbarian ability. That is a specific subclass. And a very limited resource.
so what your saying..... making other people have disadvantage on all their attacks against you is a perfectly fine ability for high levels, as we already have a subclass that can do it.When we look at that, then you need to factor in constant advantage on attacks and disadvantage for attacks against you, because you are surrounded by magical darkness way more often than the barbarian can keep that rage up.
Interesting to you have a link to the rewrite and have you tested it?My rewrite gives at-will usage of some kind to nearly all base class “ki” features in the phb. So, patient defense has no focus cost and still uses a BA, and im considering having it give DR rather than imposing disadvantage. That way, it also makes deflect attacks work more reliably, and ties the two together.
There is also a level 9 spell that does it.so what your saying..... making other people have disadvantage on all their attacks against you is a perfectly fine ability for high levels, as we already have a subclass that can do it.
Though to be fair the 9th level spell (Foresight in this case) does a LOT more than just that. And its last 8 hours.There is also a level 9 spell that does it.
or intensified it if you think the concept of short rest/long rest hurt the game all along.I think they indirectly fixed the main monk issue.
Mainly, druids, paladins, and clerics have a reason to short rest. Fighters will want their actions surge as well.
So they will get their ki back. (And warlocks will get spells back too).

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.