IcyCool
First Post
Thanee said:Well, the target also is a human, who happens to be polymorphed into an imp, not an imp.
Bye
Thanee
Except that the target is not a humanoid (human). The target is an outsider (augmented humanoid, human).
Thanee said:Well, the target also is a human, who happens to be polymorphed into an imp, not an imp.
Bye
Thanee
Thanee said:Only as long as the first PaO applies.
Bye
Thanee
... so the trick is to find a path by which each stage of PaO is permanent that gets you where you want to go, then?Thanee said:Only as long as the first PaO applies.
Bye
Thanee
Jack Simth said:... so the trick is to find a path by which each stage of PaO is permanent that gets you where you want to go, then?
Saeviomagy said:I believe the point was that when you cast the second PaO, that because the second spell will make the first irrelevant, the first step is to remove the first spell. At which point you're just casting PaO on a human again.
my inclination is that it works to us a polymorph spell to change your type to another and use a second Polymorph Any Object to make a change permenant. My reasoning is that it is not a stacking issue or a replacement issue, -again this goes back to my form alltering effect argument that i used refering to WS on my thread; but the second overrides the first due to the wording.Thanee said:Yes, but I would still base the change on the human, not on the outsider-form, because the first spell does not apply, when the second one does. They don't stack! What you do, is basically stacking the effects.
Bye
Thanee