Piratecat said:In any case, the argumentative posts are gone...
Piratecat said:Kreynolds, I'm power lunging right now...
Piratecat said:In any case, the argumentative posts are gone,
brekki said:No I really did mean 3 x str and 3.5 x str ... for 2 x str or 2.5 x str the feat would not be used at all ... ever ... in our campaigns ... and thats usually a good way to find out what's the right interpretation for your campaign.
No it isn`t.BardStephenFox said:I believe Winternight's original question has been answered in context of the Feat and the errata.
In addition to the attack [insert]normal[/insert] damage.Artoomis said:A successful attack roll during a charge allows you to inflict double your normal Strength modifier in addition to the attack's damage regardless of whether you’re using one- or two-handed weapons.
Skip? That guy who ruled that blind barbarians are immune to sneak attack?Caliban said:Every official explanation ruling I've seen put's it at x2.0 strength bonus with two-handed weapon, not x2.5 strength bonus.
That's the way Skip ruled when I asked him, that's the way the LG campaign ruled when they clarified it recently.
That's the one I use.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.