No, we don't, we already have plenty to argue about.Look, it's been two months, we need fresh things to argue about.
I disagree. We need fresh things to debate.No, we don't, we already have plenty to argue about.
I don’t know about arguing, but if I have to wait too much longer to see what solution they came up with to give warlocks more spells while preserving pact magic, I’m going to lose my mindNo, we don't, we already have plenty to argue about.
Don't worry. I'm sure they will find a way for it to be disappointing. [emoji16]I don’t know about arguing, but if I have to wait too much longer to see what solution they came up with to give warlocks more spells while preserving pact magic, I’m going to lose my mind [emoji28]
No, we don't, we already have plenty to argue about.
Yeah, I won’t be surprised if they squeeze another pass at the monk into this one.On a serious note, I wonder if they aren't trying to cram some last minute fixes from packet 6 into packet 7, hence the delay.
I took am looking forward to seeing the first run at fixing the 2014 monkYeah, I won’t be surprised if they squeeze another pass at the monk into this one.
By Golly, if we can squeeze debate rom decades old events ar a defunct company, we can generate argument from basically nothing.I disagree. We need fresh things to debate.
But is not the endless cycle of death and rebirth of these arguments part of their inherent beauty?And the circular nature of a lot of those arguments is what lead to my belief that we need a fresh packet to change it up here.