DMH said:That is not true of all of us. I am waiting 3 extra months and paying full price to get some stuff I could buy online because I don't want my FLGS to go under. It is annoying, but I want a chance to browse the books before I buy and that is impossible (to the depth I want) for any online vendor.
Pdfs are different since they are so cheap. I would have to say that I am not happy with ~25% of the ones I have purchased in the last 2 years.
DaveMage said:It may not be so much to support the LGS (per se) as to get the book in the store. If the LGS refuses to buy such a high-priced item, sales goals might not be fulfilled.
Amazon (and other internet retailers) may sell a bunch, but maybe not enough by themselves to make the product a financial success.
Barak said:But if Amazon didn't sell enough books, when compared to LGS, to make the book a success, the argument that the book being sold at Amazon hurts LGS becomes a bit shaky, no?
Numion said:I think his point was that all the usual distributors / retailers should be allowed to stock Ptolus if they wanted to. I.e. the usual way this great thing we call capitalism works![]()
Then it would be up to the customer to choose where he does his business. Not only Amazon like you suggest, but any place that wanted his business.
The FLGS in Finland is pretty expensive because they have a near monopoly - shenanigans like these that are done just to protect FLGS from competition only strengthen that monopoly. And there should be no question that monopoly is bad for the consumer.
Now, the situation is different in the states with more gaming shops, but Montes decision cost me the price difference between WW store and Amazon prices. It's not going to kill me, but it doesn't make much sense to me, either.
Numion said:Companies shouldn't have to apologize for being efficient. If FLGSs can't compete, it is their own fault. Incompetent clerks, lousy service and high prices are what I've encountered in FLGSs. If they fixed those, maybe these anti-Amazon campaigns wouldn't be needed. When companies are efficient, they win, consumers wins. It's not a zero-sum game.
While this should be true, it isn't entirely true. There is a lot of inertia to overcome because the distribution chain exists for good historical reasons. The developments in technology have made it easier for producers of product to sidestep the dsitribution chain. But for many smaller businesses, even direct sales to the customer is still a significant impact on time and energy. PDF only publishers are able to do that somewhat successfully. Especially with the growth of RPGNow, DTRPG and the ENGS. But there is still a significant portion of the population that does not like PDF.Numion said:It is mostly the distribution chains task to stay relevant as a distribution chain.
Staffan said:But part of the reason for the high price is the inefficient distribution model. Out of the $30 I pay for an RPG book, maybe 10 of those actually reach the people who make it. If companies could sell directly to customers, they could lower the price and get more money themselves.
BardStephenFox said:Selling directly to the customer will likely be the way things are done in the future. But we are at a pain point in the industry where it is not easy to sell directly to the customer. At least, it isn't to sell to the customer if the product isn't PDF. And if the product is PDF, you eliminate a good portion of your consumer base.
Actually, I had the feeling that this was the real reason behind Monte's decision. Even if he thinks that he is doing the FLGS as a sales model a favor by restricting the sales to these shops, I suppose that his main reason is to simply cover his butt. The production costs of Ptolus will be pretty high. I suppose he will have to sell through all of his stock quickly in order to get out of the minus from producing the book. The regular book channels don't provide this quick turnover; it's game shops that immediately pay for their stuff. This will also be the reason for the "limited edition" thing; no way Malhavoc can afford having thousands of unsold Ptolus books sitting around.BardStephenFox said:Actually, there are some disincentives for publishers to use the book distribution channel. Book distribution is brutal in that the big stores, Barnes & Noble, Borders and now Amazon, have a lot of negotiating room. If you sell through the book distribution channel, you have to be prepared to provide free shipping, including drop shipping to each location. You will need to be prepared to provide a deep discount. You will need to be prepared to extend your accounts receivable beyond 120 days, perhaps as much as 180 days. You may need to be prepared to settle your accounts receivable for pennies on the dollar if you want that cash flow back. You will also need to be prepared to accept returns of product that didn't move, and those returns are another hit to your cash flow.