Pull up your pants!

[Maldur]

Y'know, I think this is a good idea. I don't care if you're gorgeous or hideous, undergarments are UNDERgarments. Cover the up.

So you dont have your T-shirt visible either, as that is UNDERWEAR!

 

[Ranger REG]

So... doesn't that just encourage people to not wear underwear?

Nah, they'll just follow up with the "No-Commando Law."

Government are so reactive.

Personally, there oughta be a law banning tattooes over butt-cracks. Honestly, do you want such a tattoo when you're 65 and still trying to wear low-riding spandex? U crazy!

 

[Algolei]

Speaking of which, they should outlaw spandex too.

 

[Angel Tarragon]

I may have to put up with incessant heat in the summer, but at least I can dress however I like. Whats next? Outlawing fast food because some people eat too much? Pathetic. It our lives, we should be able to make our own choices.

 

[hong]

So... doesn't that just encourage people to not wear underwear?

No, it encourages people not to wear pants.


Hong "such as I am doing now" Ooi

 

[MonsterMash]

No, it encourages people not to wear pants.


Hong "such as I am doing now" Ooi

Of course as a Brit to me pants are underwear - what you wear as outergarments is trousers. Don't the aussies still call them strides anyway?

Now just waiting for Virginia to outlaw Hong!

 

[ReignMan]

What's worse is that Virginians have paid for a bunch of people to sit around and come up with this. Did they not have anything better to do.

All in favour of the commando solution say I.

 

[jonesy]

The article says:
On Tuesday, the House of Delegates approved a bill that would fine anyone who "intentionally makes an obscene display" of his or her "below-waist undergarments intended to cover a person's intimate parts, in a lewd or indecent matter."

There's room for interpretations.

 

[DragonSword]

Sooo glad I don't live in Virginia. I know this is a little crude, but I guess the name says it all.

 

[DragonSword]

Whoops, I think that counts as an obscene display!