der_kluge said:I don't think they'll remove gnomes. They talked about doing that in 3rd edition, and people (well half of them in any case) started soaking their torches in oil and sharpening their pitchforks.
Aus_Snow said:Hello Warlock?
Scout as Ranger, methinks. With a bit of the old Ranger, maybe.
Oh, well that's settled then. It was actually just a guess!Monkey Boy said:I recall Scott Rouse?? mentioning an iconic Tiefling Warlock?
I imagine so. It fits in so perfectly with everything else they've been hyping, re: 4e. Otherwise, I suppose they could make other classes a tad more Warlock-ish. Or *both* <- the most likely option, IMO.Perhaps Warlock replaces Sorceror?
Mark said:I see where a few people are making mention of where they think they recall seeing some information but this thread would have more legs with links to any official sources.
Simplicity said:I haven't seen a mention of AC stays... I would be surprised if they didn't go with the Fort/Ref/Will Defense mechanic of SWSE...
Typically, this sort of mechanic would have the caster roll against the defense. So, the wizard might have a +8 on his third-level spells, and he'd roll against the Reflex Defense of the targets. The enormous advantage in gameplay for this is that there's only one roll, applied against the Defense of however many targets. When there are thirty orcs in the AoE of your Enlarged Fireball, the current method can take quite some time ...teitan said:Ok then how does Fireball work?
Kamikaze Midget said:Warlord? (I think I remember this mentioned somewhere?)