To me the martials are fighter, rogue, and barbarian.To clarify you said martials, but are you really asking about martials or are you asking about non-casters or are you asking about fighters or some other combination of classes?
But in 2024, barbarian won't be martial as it will be more powered by primal, arcane, or divine depending on subclass.
That's the thing to me that blocks me.I am not sure what you mean exactly by top of himan ability, but I think if we want a certain dynamic that puts PCs above and beyond what the rules currently allow, that should be captured in a subclass and I would be ok with a subclass for fighters or wizards or any other class that did that. I do not think that kind of thing should be a part of the core class mechanics as I think many players don't want that in the class. They have a different idea of what they want to play when they select a class
At the very least, a martial character HAS TO become an extraordinary person at Tier 3.
There are no martial character who gets past level 11 without either
1) Becoming Extraordinary
Or
2) The DM playing favorites with rewards or status
No matter what subclass the player takes, if it is balanced it or the core class becomes extraordinary. And being extraordinary requires new rules.
Even the basic Champion is Extraordinary.
A martial subclass that does not add new takes on the rules or new rules to remain not extraordinary is underpowered.
An underpowered person who performs on par without dumb luck is being cheated for or cheating.
Last edited: