Obryn
Hero
Funny, I've never let that stop me?A lot of great ideas, but sadly none of them are in the PHB or DMG.
Funny, I've never let that stop me?A lot of great ideas, but sadly none of them are in the PHB or DMG.
No matter what is said if the game itself offers a path via options to play the traditional hit point way then I'll likely buy. I am at the moment taking them at their word as that is all I have. As such I'm not buying. In fact I'm boycotting wotc completely.
I cannot speak for the for internal playtesters, but they have continued to use outside alpha playtesters as well. In my group of 7, we range from "it wasn't that bad, 4E had a number of good points, but was still the worst edition" to "I'll never play 4E again." Most are closer to the latter. A couple strongly prefer Pathfinder. Hardly a bunch of fanboys, or fangirl, here.I also do not for a second think that the internal playtesters have no bias. They are fanboys who likely at least tolerated 4e. If they hated 4e and railed against it I doubt they'd have been asked.
No matter what is said if the game itself offers a path via options to play the traditional hit point way then I'll likely buy. I am at the moment taking them at their word as that is all I have. As such I'm not buying. In fact I'm boycotting wotc completely.
If they had seriously tried to address my playstyle and failed I'd be far more willing to houserule..
II don't want any second wind even one that is temp hit points. I might have interpreted a temp hit point rule as them trying if they also covered swapping out HD for something more like old school hit points in the DMG. .
IPersonally I really like old school hit points. I don't need a wounds module. I just need slow natural recovery and magic only heals fast. It's always worked for me..
II do not think that the martial camp is small. I believe though that the devs are confusing a.desire for slow healing with an antipathy towards martial healing. It may be that they believe SW being self healing is more acceptable than another PC shouting you back up. They did run away from the warlord at high speed..
ISo I do believe they know there is a major problem. They just don't fully understand why. Mike Mearls has said that the playerbase is split on healing. .
II also do not for a second think that the internal playtesters have no bias. They are fanboys who likely at least tolerated 4e. If they hated 4e and railed against it I doubt they'd have been asked..
INo matter what is said if the game itself offers a path via options to play the traditional hit point way then I'll likely buy. I am at the moment taking them at their word as that is all I have. As such I'm not buying. In fact I'm boycotting wotc completely.
[wiki] He will, because Emerikol is FAR from alone.[/wiki][wiki] And I'm sure Mearls will cry into his cornflakes because Emerikol didn't buy 5e! Oh, the humanity.[/wiki]
At least a dozen people have given you suggestions <snip> Yet you keep waving the bloody shirt hoping to convince WotC to recall ALL the printed PHBs to fix your silly corner-case complaint.
You have to fix TWO things, not rewrite the whole healing subsystem.
What they haven't done is cater to the "Nomartialhealingevernotevenalittle1hpperday" crowd.
And if we want to compare anecdotal evidence, I've played D&D with several groups from 1994 to today. Never had ONE of them that didn't handwave "hp back to full". So there.
It does. HP is in the game. Cure spells are in the game. Cut the parts you don't want. How hard is that? And hey, lets make all these decisions before the PHB, much less DMG is out.
And I'm sure Mearls will cry into his cornflakes because Emerikol didn't buy 5e! Oh, the humanity.
I'm sure there are plenty of one-issue voters who won't buy it for a multitude of reasons. I'm sure there are plenty who will buy it. At the risk of Mistoprophecizing, I think the latter will outnumber the former. Time will tell.He will, because Emerikol is FAR from alone.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.