So Moderators are cool with using controversial subject headers to get attention?

[Darrin Drader]

...So moderators are cool with me using "penis" and "oak" in the same sentence so as to equate the size of the former with the latter? Because if I'm going to go all necrophiliac on a gnome, I'd like my member to be truly arboreal.

Indeed, two wrongs don't make a right, but now I think we're up to 3 wrongs.

 

[Ankh-Morpork Guard]

Indeed, two wrongs don't make a right, but now I think we're up to 3 wrongs.

Could have sworn we were closed to four hundred or so...

 

[Tom Cashel]

Its a good thing you aren't commenting on this subject. You might be tempted to say something a tad hypocritical.

Ah, Kai Lord. Your ability to miss the point is only limited by the amount of points that are made.

My roundabout statements were meant to underline the utter stupidity of complaining about somebody else's "offensive" post while including all kinds of e-mail porn subject lines in your own. What...you're the only one who's allowed to type such things?

Now run off to Mommy Moderator and report this post. Good boy!

Note: as wrongs approach infinity, rightness becomes an attainable goal. Or so one would hope.

 

[Gez]

If there's an infinity of wrongs, they will naturally take a spherical shape together, as the sphere is the most efficient volume.

Now, right is, by definition, like a straight line (as in, right ahead); so once the wrongs are spherical they should roll along the rightness and eventually fall down somewhere where they will be forgotten.

 

[EricNoah]

Yeah, but .... what is the color of love?

 

[alsih2o]

Yeah, but .... what is the color of love?

a soft, lightish blue. with pink and green sprinkles.


or, was that rhetorical?

 

[Henry]

a soft, lightish blue. with pink and green sprinkles.

No, I thought that was the color of one hand clapping.

I won't ask what the sound of love is - this isn't NKL, for goodness' sake.

 

[Kai Lord]

Ah, Kai Lord. Your ability to miss the point is only limited by the amount of points that are made.

My roundabout statements were meant to underline the utter stupidity of complaining about somebody else's "offensive" post while including all kinds of e-mail porn subject lines in your own. What...you're the only one who's allowed to type such things?

In a subject header? Oops, that was the issue now wasn't it? There's a difference between making a comment to prove a point in the middle of a post written on the subject than to shout it in a subject header in a totally unrelated forum.

Did I say I was above ever making a crude joke? It'd be nice, but anyone who saw my original subject header to this very thread knows otherwise.

As for being "offended," it was a joke. "I'm offended you're offended I was irritated" didn't have the same ring, so I changed it to get a laugh. All caught up now?

 

[Piratecat]

I'm offended by your explanation.

 

[Umbran]

If there's an infinity of wrongs, they will naturally take a spherical shape together, as the sphere is the most efficient volume.

Ah, but this assumes that wrongness has cohesiveness, either in the form of a surface tension, or a form of self-attraction. However, tests in the field show that wrongness tends to spread out and sprawl. Rather than sticking together, wrongness spreads. It even shows some of the qualities of a superfluid...