Mine are great.Umbran said:Silly names in D&D are often not great...
Ditto. Any break in internal consistency within the framework of the setting does it for me as well.Piratecat said:Anachronisms and silly names. If I run across Phred the ranger, or an NPC named Ash who's weilding a big chainsword on his hand, my suspension of disbelief gets stomped on.
Im my experience, this is the truest test of if the game is working.Mallus said:Err, the players keep coming back...
Piratecat said:Anachronisms and silly names. If I run across Phred the ranger, or an NPC named Ash who's weilding a big chainsword on his hand, my suspension of disbelief gets stomped on.
Sure is. And I'm under no illusions that my current game would work for everyone. I'm happy to find that people around here have been really positive about the Story Hour, though that's probably due to the player --Rolzup-- whose writes it, and his commensurate skill doing comedic fantasy.Black Omega said:Im my experience, this is the truest test of if the game is working.
Andor said:I dunno. Plenty of people have been named Fred, or Bob or Harry. People get given god awful names in reality, like Millard Filmore or Gary Gygax. I mean how believable does that sound? Watch movie credits sometimes, parents are cruel creatures.
And really, why does a name like Richard Head (which is a real name) stress people out more than some 'fantasy' name like Varangul the Skullcrusher?
Someone said:So, what´s your limit?
I just feel the need to mention (incase this example actually happens) that sundering only applies to objects that somebody is holding. RAW you can shoot an unattended object all you want.Kahuna Burger said:Inability to attempt a straigfhtforward action because my character lacks a feat. ie, "I try to shoot the rope to sever it." "Do you have Ranger Sunder?" "I have a +25 attack bonus, my bow shoots flaming arrows, and its an ordinary rope pulled tight by what its holding up!" "You need the ranged sunder feat." *headdesk*