Tonguez said:
A fact I heard on discovery channel that really freaked me was that the ancestral 'Amazon' and 'Congo' rivers once had a common source! (back in the Pangea days) because this resonantes with the biblical description of the river that flowed from
Eden and then split into four
Interesting site. I don't see how he can, say, differentiate Jewish skeletons from other humans, but hey. Such is great inspiration for gaming.
However, the crack you'll find on cable TV and in print is truly amazing. I greatly enjoy Graham Hancock, for example; he's fun, he asks some decent questions*, and he is willing to admit being wrong from time to time. But a lot of that stuff is...odd.
Just in this instance, for example...it's amazingly unlikely that the Amazon and Congo would ever have flown from the same source, since the topography of Pangaea would've been vastly different from the modern day. There may've been rivers, but they probably wouldn't've started in the same part of the proto-South America and proto-Africa plates as they do now.
Now, if/when I ever run a D&D game, I'll mine Graham Hancock and his ilk for all they're worth, and then some.
Brad
* - So, when you've tracked down what you believe to be the Ark of the Covenant, is it REALLY a good idea to ask the nice people who haven't killed you for your impertinence if you can see it? As your VERY FIRST QUESTION? And fourth? And seventh? (sigh)