log in or register to remove this ad

 

D&D 5E Some Fizban's Treasury of Dragons sneak peek previews

Urriak Uruk

Debate fuels my Fire
No way of knowing that until the book is released. For example, there isn't an Aspect of Saridor listed, even though we know he's covered in the book.

I think it was said previously that Sadior may be covered, but he's not getting Aspect statistics. He's not on par with Tiamat/Bahamut (who were created in Io's death).
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Worse case, one can always just refluff your choice of the Aspect of Bahamut/Tiamat and just swap out the Breath Weapon element type with whatever seems appropriate.

The only dragon type that I wish was in there was Purple Dragons, but there were already a crap-ton of different dragon types in 3.0/3.5 that it all got a bit confusing keeping track. But we have Shadow Dragons so I'm happy. Steel Dragons though, are probably not going to be accounted for and its gonna be another case of refluffing Silver/whatever as a template or something.
 

Parmandur

Book-Friend
Worse case, one can always just refluff your choice of the Aspect of Bahamut/Tiamat and just swap out the Breath Weapon element type with whatever seems appropriate.

The only dragon type that I wish was in there was Purple Dragons, but there were already a crap-ton of different dragon types in 3.0/3.5 that it all got a bit confusing keeping track. But we have Shadow Dragons so I'm happy. Steel Dragons though, are probably not going to be accounted for and its gonna be another case of refluffing Silver/whatever as a template or something.
Deep Dragons are Purple Dragons.
 







Scribe

Hero
I thought only settings with setting books got added?

I don’t see anything that would stop me from publishing a Greyhawk or Zendikar or Dark Sun product on DMs Guild. Can I do that?

For now, DMs Guild is limited to the Forgotten Realms, Ravenloft, Eberron, Ravnica, and Theros settings only, although you can also publish anything for 5th Edition that (i) is generic enough to be used in a permitted setting without effort and (ii) doesn’t explicitly use anything related to another official Wizards setting.
 


I thought only settings with setting books got added?

It's not actually a rule that only settings with setting books are allowed, for example Ravenloft was allowed BEFORE its setting book was relased, back when it only had CoS out.

My thinking is FToD is likely the closest Tarkir and Council of Wyrms is getting to an official release.
 

Scribe

Hero
It's not actually a rule that only settings with setting books are allowed, for example Ravenloft was allowed BEFORE its setting book was relased, back when it only had CoS out.

My thinking is FToD is likely the closest Tarkir and Council of Wyrms is getting to an official release.
I mean I guess. Council of Wyrms I would be into, anything MTG can disappear lol.
 

Parmandur

Book-Friend
It's not actually a rule that only settings with setting books are allowed, for example Ravenloft was allowed BEFORE its setting book was relased, back when it only had CoS out.

My thinking is FToD is likely the closest Tarkir and Council of Wyrms is getting to an official release.
That's not actually a rule, that's a pattern. They have unleashed most of the Settings that got books (exception being Critical Role, for obvious reasons),but they could unleash others when and if they so chose.
 


Level Up!

An Advertisement

Advertisement4

Top