Whizbang Dustyboots
Gnometown Hero
Says the guy who wrote the book -- literally! -- about giving more historical accuracy/plausibilty to one's D&D games.jgbrowning said:
Spiders in Drow of the Underdark
- Thread starter JustKim
- Start date
Michael Silverbane
Adventurer
jgbrowning said:Sure is a long thread about some artists mis-drawing an insect. ENworld's an odd place....
joe b.
Arachnid.
Later
silver
This seems to be just another example of WotC's approach to quality. They don't bother with putting much thought, research, or playtesting into products. If it's unbalanced they say "who cares, wait for the next book", and if it's unrealistic they say "who cares, it's magic/fantasy/just a game".
That said, DotU seems to be an otherwise quite interesting book. So, maybe those are fiendish spiders? In real life, I've never yet seen any fiendish spider that looked like a normal spider.
That said, DotU seems to be an otherwise quite interesting book. So, maybe those are fiendish spiders? In real life, I've never yet seen any fiendish spider that looked like a normal spider.
Spiderboobies?
JustKim
First Post
mhacdebhandia
Explorer
Well, crap. Considering the quality of most figures in D&D art, we're in trouble . . .DM_Jeff said:
(I'd rather see something exaggerated but cool, like Wayne Reynold's artwork, than something highly accurate but utterly dull. Unfortunately, most of what we get is distorted and ugly or boring.)
mhacdebhandia
Explorer
That's the best idea I've ever heard.Klaus said:
Sound of Azure
Contemplative Soul
JustKim said:
That spider look Tonka Tuff!
Similar Threads
