• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

[SPOILERS] THE Return of the King Thread


log in or register to remove this ad

Merlion said:
read there posts again. They tell everyone to STOP THE CONDECESNION. You are STILL DOING IT


If you actually bothered to check the accuracy of your postings from time to time, you wouldn't need to be corrected. If you don't want to be dcorrected, stop acting like a petulant child.

if you cant see how the way you are speaking to us all could be insulting (as about 3 or 4 posters have said) thats your problem, not mine


If you want to be insulted when your incorrect statements are exposed for what they are, that's your problem, not mine.
 

Merlion said:
You dont have to use foul language or actual come out and say " your stupid and have no idea what your talking about" to be insulting.


The problem is, with most of the posts I have dealt with, the people I have responded to, in many cases, really don't know what they are talking about. If they want to be pissed off when it is pointed out that they don't know what they are talking about, that's their concern.
 

Storm Raven said:
[/b]

The problem is, with most of the posts I have dealt with, the people I have responded to, in many cases, really don't know what they are talking about. If they want to be pissed off when it is pointed out that they don't know what they are talking about, that's their concern.

That's probably enough Storm. These posts aren't contributing anything, and you're closing in on a dozen of them. Merlion obviously isn't going to let it go, so you should.

PS
 

Storm Raven said:
I'm still trying to figure out how a person who hasn't read LotR could come to that conclusion though. Obviously, you've read both (as have I), and I didn't find Dragonlance that much more user friendly (mostly because I was bored most of the way through them), but I am not sure how someone who hasn't read both could make a comparison.

I read the first 100 pages of LotR and found it too boring to continue with at that time. I may take another crack at them in the future.

As for your insults...You shouldn't go fishing today because you're not going to catch anything.
 


Flexor the Mighty! said:
And yes, the Dragonlance novels were far more user friendly. A lot less to digest IMO. As good as LoTR? Well that's for the reader to decide. I enjoyed the first two trilogies quite a bit and would love to see a movie trilogy made out of the first set of books.

Not like this, you wouldn't!

Teehee!

-Hyp.
 

Storm Raven said:
The problem is, with most of the posts I have dealt with, the people I have responded to, in many cases, really don't know what they are talking about. If they want to be pissed off when it is pointed out that they don't know what they are talking about, that's their concern.

Storm Raven - correcting errors is fine. You're contributing a lot to the discussion. But you are coming off as rude - please be nicer when you expose people's inexcusable ignorance.

Merlion - stop pointing it out. It's not helping the tone of the thread either.

-Hyp.
(Moderator)
 

Hypersmurf said:
Storm Raven - correcting errors is fine. You're contributing a lot to the discussion. But you are coming off as rude - please be nicer when you expose people's inexcusable ignorance.

Merlion - stop pointing it out. It's not helping the tone of the thread either.
This thread has been hijacked for 5 pages now, I can't really see anyone's opinion changing.

I didn't even get to put in my theory that Merry & Pippin paid the Balrog to whack Gandalf because Gandalf was gonna narc on their drug running! The thread is too hostile, so what's the point?
 

Thanks Hyper
I only continued pointing it out because they both continued being rude after PC and Morrus had posted warnings.
But Flexor is right I think thease threads are pretty much done with anyway
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top