In response to a quesiton in another thread:
Black Omega said:
I'd hope so, they pretty much skipped it in the main book.
Is it just mostly stats or do they work in information on various firearms as well? It's been quite some time since anyone did a decent firearms guide for RPG's in general.
It looks great. I am going to try to write up a review for RPG.net by tommorrow if i have enough time to read it by then.
Well, they have stats, but also at least a paragraph on each weapon, and each weapon has characteristics mentioned. Example: in addition to all the stats, size, weight, etc., for the Walther PPK, it also has the characteristics DS and DT. DS stands for Double-Safe which is part of the new rules and essentially means an agent never has to worry about a gun going off accidentally. DT stands for Discreet and means Spot and Search checks are made more difficult when looking for this weapon when it is concealed. The Japanese Type 89 Assault Rifle (5.56mm NATO) mentions has CS and DP. CS means collapsible stock (with associated effects on use), while DP means dependable and means two action dice must be spent to activate a malfunction on this weapon. Stuff like that makes your weapons, generic in the Spycraft Handbook, suddenly much more unique.
In addition, weapons are broken down into categories and details are provided for what sorts of modifications can be added to each. In addition to guns, there are rules for additional melee weapons (especially things that are clearly weapon-like that might be lying around, like a Fire Axe, a Sledge Hammer, or an acetylene torch), all kinds of missile weapons, a number of exotic (mostly martial arts) or archaic weapons, mines, mortars, rocket launcher, weapon accessories and additional armor.
There are about 25 pages of new and advanced rules (all optional) to make handling and use of weapons more realistic.
One thing that pleases me very much is that they have included a decent number of older weapons for those of us who are designing a campaign set pre-1950.
Okay, more in my review, assuming I get to it.