Mortaneus said:
I didn't say that it was a bad rendition of WoT, nor was it not a good game. What I meant was that it wasn't anything special as games went. It was just more of the same. Spycraft knocked down the walls and stomped out quite a new bit of territory as far as d20 goes.
In my book, that makes it worthy of a 5.
Havoc said:
My name is not Virginia
Havoc said:
So, if I have to make a recommandation to someone tight on budget , it would be: buy WoTC D20 stuff first, and then, if you have some cash left, consider buying something else.
Furn_Darkside said:
Salutations,
Just to be clear- the Virginia line was not a suggestion at your identity..
It was a refernce to:
Yes, Virginia, There is a Santa Claus
FD
Havoc said:My name is not Virginia,
I really think that few compagnies are able to produce - or have ever produced any - RPG books of the same quality as Wizard's; take for instance the much criticised class books; sure they could have been much better, but then there are also lot of problems in Mongoose ones (which I love), AEG's ones (I like many ideas there); unbalancing stuff, poor editing, terrible art sometimes etc.
I have the luck to be able to spend quite a lot on roleplaying games, but it is not the case for everybody. So, if I have to make a recommandation to someone tight on budget , it would be: buy WoTC D20 stuff first, and then, if you have some cash left, consider buying something else.
In making your second point, you seem to have forgotten your first point. Since it is a matter of preference, I don't really see what you're complaining about. There is no objective truth that the Wheel of Time game is better than Spycraft. Even I can say this, and I mostly agree with you -- I love my WoT game, and can't see why I should buy Spycraft when I can get d20 Modern instead. Obviously, some folks think otherwise. I don't see any need to get my panties in a bunch because of that.Havoc said:But ok it's a matter of preference;
[...]
What I was saying, when I started this thread, is this: 5 should be an indication that a product deserves your inconditional purchase.
Psion said:
Like Furn said, it's an expression. Sorry to confuse you.
Three things:
1) Sure there are publishers worse than WotC. There always will be. But there are some third party publishers that outperform WotC on a frequent basis.
2) WotC isn't quite the performer it used to be. Sure, I rather like the classbooks and think they get a bad rap. But over the last year, they have lost some of their best talent, and it is beginning to show. Deities & Demigods, Stronghold Builders Guidebook... *yawn*.
3) Company is not a sole determiner. There are some wizards products I would recommend over some d20 products, others I would not.
Frex, I would recommend the Book of the Righteous over Deities & Demigods seven days a week and twice on Sundays...
Joshua Dyal said:
In making your second point, you seem to have forgotten your first point. Since it is a matter of preference, I don't really see what you're complaining about. There is no objective truth that the Wheel of Time game is better than Spycraft. Even I can say this, and I mostly agree with you -- I love my WoT game, and can't see why I should buy Spycraft when I can get d20 Modern instead. Obviously, some folks think otherwise. I don't see any need to get my panties in a bunch because of that.
And I disagree with your main thesis anyway -- Wizards of the Coast does not necessarily produce superior products to the competition. I admit, they often make prettier products, but not necessarily better ones.
Havoc said:
I am not complaining, not really.
Just saying, to make a long story short: WoTC gets unfairly poor reviews, more often than not, especially when compared to other products that are far from perfect.
Theirs are not perfect maybe, but they are the reference.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.