Yeah typos will eventually get fixedYou have a couple of typos "Pazuzus" instead of "Pazuzu's" but generally I like it. Is indicating 17th level for the fire bolt instead of describing the amount of damage 5e standard for fiends? I'm away from my book.
That's actually a pretty good idea. I might substitute the boring "attack" legendary action with a more fitting flyby. Thanks for the suggestion!Looks pretty good! My only input would be to maybe give him some variant of flyby attack or other mobility-increasing traits, since Pazuzu was described as primarily a demon associated with air and the skies, so you'd think he'd have a great deal of experience with maneuverability. This sort of thing would also help him do hit-and-run tactics in between charming and dominating.
I figured the "17th level" stuff was standard format - there rest of your design was spot on in my opinion.
Anyways, Pazuzu has always been my favorite of these demon lords, and I like your take.
My reason for not allowing a save on Coercion was that, otherwise, Coercion needs two successful d20 rolls to do anything. First, a failed save for the target. Second, the target needs to hit its ally with the forced attack. It would end up being a very inaccurate power.I think Coercion should allow a save.
Well, yes, DCs are high, but that's intentional. We're talking about a CR 26, something that even level 20 PCs could lose against. It is not meant to be your average opponent. Without strong backup or powerful magic items, I assume that even an high level party should have a chance to die to a CR 26 legendary demon.Don't forget that you're forcing a creature to use its one and only reaction. And really, how often will a PC make a DC 25 CHA save? If they're proficient in CHA and have a high stat (bard, warlock, sorceror, paladin) they'll be saving at +9 to +11 at level 20, but that's rolling a 14 or more at best. A 2/3 chance of failure. And what about all the others? Your level 20 fighter or wizard or cleric or barbarian or... is going to be saving at maybe +1 or +2, so will only save on a 20.
Nice work Olrox17. Do you mind if I edit this a bit and use it in my "5e Epic Monster Updates" thread: http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?468639-5e-EPIC-MONSTER-UPDATES
I would of course credit you and link to this thread as well.
Great! Thank you so much. FYI, I will need to revise it some as my version of Pazuzu is CR 32 or 33 I think.Sure, go for it! I like what you're doing in that thread, and I'd be happy to have some of my work there.
No worries, I knew that already. I've checked your thread a couple times in the past. I think I remember you having a similar thread on the old WOTC forums, too.Great! Thank you so much. FYI, I will need to revise it some as my version of Pazuzu is CR 32 or 33 I think.
No worries, I knew that already. I've checked your thread a couple times in the past. I think I remember you having a similar thread on the old WOTC forums, too.
Don't forget that you're forcing a creature to use its one and only reaction. And really, how often will a PC make a DC 25 CHA save? If they're proficient in CHA and have a high stat (bard, warlock, sorceror, paladin) they'll be saving at +9 to +11 at level 20, but that's rolling a 14 or more at best. A 2/3 chance of failure. And what about all the others? Your level 20 fighter or wizard or cleric or barbarian or... is going to be saving at maybe +1 or +2, so will only save on a 20.
Going by raw numbers, you're probably right. However, I wouldn't underestimate the sheer versatility that 1/day wish brings to the table.The new version looks like a fairly solid CR26 based on the DMG method.
I suspect in actual play it might be more like a CR24 or CR25 tho.