Last night we came to a debate about the maneuvers Stunning Assault.
I personally think that all melee attack should apply the Constitution Saving throw. My DM think that it shouldn't apply to off-hand attack.
Little back story, the player using Stunning assault is a Berzerker using 2 weapon, and pretty much built like a crit machine.
I do feel like a 3 point maneuvers should apply a good effect
Stunning Assault (3 points)
2nd degree Tempered Iron action
Prerequisites: Extra Attack
You strike your opponent with enough force to stun them.
When you activate this maneuver, you take the Attack action and make a weapon attack, as well as any additional attacks granted by Extra Attack. Until the start of your next turn, when you hit a creature with a melee weapon attack it makes a Constitution saving throw or is stunned until the end of your next turn.
TLDR: DM think that Stunning assault should be apply only on main attack (from the maneuver) and reactions. Or its too OP
Thoughts?
Little back story, the player using Stunning assault is a Berzerker using 2 weapon, and pretty much built like a crit machine.
I do feel like a 3 point maneuvers should apply a good effect
Stunning Assault (3 points)
2nd degree Tempered Iron action
Prerequisites: Extra Attack
You strike your opponent with enough force to stun them.
When you activate this maneuver, you take the Attack action and make a weapon attack, as well as any additional attacks granted by Extra Attack. Until the start of your next turn, when you hit a creature with a melee weapon attack it makes a Constitution saving throw or is stunned until the end of your next turn.
TLDR: DM think that Stunning assault should be apply only on main attack (from the maneuver) and reactions. Or its too OP
Thoughts?
Last edited: