Whizbang Dustyboots
Gnometown Hero
I think gray skinned drow is a smart direction to take in advance of the movie and TV series. It's one less possible hurdle cleared for mainstream success.
Actually I am sure @Oofta to is correct. The truth is very few ancient norse people left their homelands (heck that is true of most people in the world today). That some did, does not change that fact.
In fact, since most bigotry is based on ignorance, it seems to be a strong correlation between bigotry and how much one spends around the demographic they are bigoted against. I.e., if the only information you're getting about a demographic is stereotypes (and often pejorative ones), then it's more likely to hold prejudice views towards that demographic when you've never actually met them.But what @Oofta was claiming is that Norse people obviously were not racist against dark-skinned people because most of them never even met someone with such a skin tone. Sure, the individual statements are not different, but their intent and correctness in supporting the intent are. You can't be racist against a group of people that you have no awareness of, which is what @Oofta was trying to say. However, I pointed out that they indeed were aware of them. You don't need to have met someone of a certain race in order to be racist towards them, you merely have to be aware of them, which the Norse people very much were.
Now, I'm not saying that the Vikings were racist against brown/black people, I don't know whether they were or weren't, but @Oofta's insistence that they couldn't have been because a lot of them never even met someone with dark skin is just laughably false. You can be racist against black people without ever having met one, just like you can be transphobic without ever meeting a trans person. You just have to know that they exist.
I lived in the Middle East for a while, and there were some bizarre conspiracy theories about American and Israeli Jews -- even by the standards of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories -- by people who admitted they'd never met a single one.In fact, since most bigotry is based on ignorance, it seems to be a strong correlation between bigotry and how much one spends around the demographic they are bigoted against. I.e., if the only information you're getting about a demographic is stereotypes (and often pejorative ones), then it's more likely to hold prejudice views towards that demographic when you've never actually met them.
I mean, hasn't it? I don't know anyone who doesn't think Heinlein was an abusive scam artist at best and an outright Fascist and worst, and even if Heinlein himself wasn't a Fascist, Starship Troopers is certainly a fashy book. I mean back in the 90s Starship Troopers the movie came out specifically to mock the book and Heinlein's attitudes.Fascinating that science fiction gaming hasn’t yet been reviewed to such an extent in a similar light. Perhaps because some speculative fiction explored current socio-political issues in allegorical form? Others however are often deemed practically propaganda.
Just wondering why this current trend of scrutiny of the fantasy genre for racism isn’t also happening as fervently for sci fi. Arguably it has happened for Lovecraft, but surely it will expand to Heinlein and others eventually.
I think history has shown that "not leaving your homeland" doesn't mean you're friendly to foreigners - usually the opposite. People like that tend to be mistrustful of people they don't know even if they look similar. They can be really unfriendly to people who look/sound strange. Again, this is not across the board but neither can you claim that one can't be racist against a people that they have not met - they can - they can literally hate anyone they have not actually met.Actually I am sure @Oofta to is correct. The truth is very few ancient norse people left their homelands (heck that is true of most people in the world today). That some did, does not change that fact.
I wasn't trying to suggest that and not sure why you thought I was. Nothing I said or quoted mentioned anything along those lines.I think history has shown that "not leaving your homeland" doesn't mean you're friendly to foreigners - usually the opposite.
It was part of the larger discussion. The part I quoted in your post was about people not leaving their homelands. If you track that back, you'll see that it was suggested that people can't be racist against people that they have not met. Either way, I wasn't implying what you thought about it one way or the other, only what I thought about it.I wasn't trying to suggest that and not sure why you thought I was. Nothing I said or quoted mentioned anything along those lines.