Tempest fighter and multi-classing

[javcs]

First: Tempest fighters deal more extra damage with weapons that are off-hand weapons. Suppose you took the Two-Weapon Warrior Multi-class feat - the one that lets you use one-handed weapons in your off hand as though it were an off-hand weapon.
Do you deal the normal +1 bonus damage or do you do the +2 for an off-hand weapon with your non-primary hand? I assume that the primary hand would remain the +1 with a one-handed weapon.

Secondly, is there a multi-class feat for the Tempest Technique? If so, where is it?

 

[Mort_Q]

... is there a multi-class feat for the Tempest Technique? If so, where is it?

You can get it with a Hybrid character, but I don't think that there is currently a multiclass feat for it.

Suppose you took the Two-Weapon Warrior Multi-class feat - the one that lets you use one-handed weapons in your off hand as though it were an off-hand weapon.
Do you deal the normal +1 bonus damage or do you do the +2 for an off-hand weapon with your non-primary hand? I assume that the primary hand would remain the +1 with a one-handed weapon.

Why reading would be no, as it is not an offhand weapon. That said, I'd be willing to be convinced otherwise.

 

[Chzbro]

I agree with Mort Q.

The feat allows you to deal extra damage with off-hand weapons, not with weapons wielded in your off-hand.

As far as I can tell, if the weapon itself does not have the off-hand property, you don't get the damage boost.

 

[Starfox]

I agree with Mort Q.

The feat allows you to deal extra damage with off-hand weapons, not with weapons wielded in your off-hand.

As far as I can tell, if the weapon itself does not have the off-hand property, you don't get the damage boost.

Agree with this.

I find it kind of odd that only the fighter really benefits from using those off-hand weapons - two-weapon rangers don't. If you want a Katar specialist, the concept works much better as a fighter than as a ranger.

 

[DracoSuave]

Agree with this.

I find it kind of odd that only the fighter really benefits from using those off-hand weapons - two-weapon rangers don't. If you want a Katar specialist, the concept works much better as a fighter than as a ranger.

Well, the Ranger gets to use better weapons than the off-hand weapons. It's like choosing between a chocolate sundae with fudge topping and a cherry, and a regular ice cream. Just because you're saying 'But it comes with chocolate sprinkles!' doesn't make the whole better than the original chocolate sundae.


However, let's examine the feat. 'wield one-handed weapons in your off-hand as though they were off-hand weapons.' Notice that it does not indicate which rules that applies to. It only says that they are treated as off-hand weapons. This means that -any- rule involving off-hand weapons apply to them. This includes the 'can only wield off-hand weapons in your off-hand' rule, but is not exclusive to that.

So, yes, a tempest fighter does get to apply his bonus because the feat gives him the ability to wield non-off-hand weapons -as tho they were off-hand.- This is -exactly the same- as how a wizard can apply Wand of Accuracy to attacks made through a sword implement if he takes Wizard of the Spiral. No, it's not a wand, but it is treated as though it were a wand.

 

[Klaus]

One thing of note is that you only treat a weapon in your off-hand as an off-hand weapon. So if you want to get a bonus on both hands, your main weapon has to be an official off-hand weapon.

 

[Chzbro]

So, yes, a tempest fighter does get to apply his bonus because the feat gives him the ability to wield non-off-hand weapons -as tho they were off-hand.- This is -exactly the same- as how a wizard can apply Wand of Accuracy to attacks made through a sword implement if he takes Wizard of the Spiral. No, it's not a wand, but it is treated as though it were a wand.

While I'll happily admit that my opinion might be wrong, I don't think the situation is "exactly" like the wizard situation. The wizard treats his longsword as though it were a wand, yes, but "wand" is not a weapon property; it's an implement. So Wizards treating their swords as if they were wands would be the same as the multi-class ranger treating his sword as if it were a dagger (or handaxe or whatever) and taking all the hits to damage dice and the like. But that's not what the feat says.

The chainfighter feat, for example, gives the spiked chain the light blade and the off-hand properties, but the ranger feat is not worded in this way. It says that you can wield one-handed weapons in your off hand as if they were off-hand weapons, but doesn't say that one-handed weapons wielded in your off hand are treated as if they had the one-hand property.

Sure this is nit-picky, but I believe it's what's intended. In the same way, I don't think you get to treat a longsword or bastard sword wielded in two hands as a two-handed weapon for the purposes of powers and feats that reward bonuses for 2-handed weapons (like Reaping Strike or the Bloodclaw enchant).

It doesn't matter how you're allowed to wield them (in my opinion), if it doesn't have the weapon property (off-hand/2-hand) you don't get the bonus.

Again, however, this is only my own understanding of the rules.

 

[Starfox]

Well, the Ranger gets to use better weapons than the off-hand weapons. It's like choosing between a chocolate sundae with fudge topping and a cherry, and a regular ice cream. Just because you're saying 'But it comes with chocolate sprinkles!' doesn't make the whole better than the original chocolate sundae.

I actually came up with a Katar Ranger that works - a beastmaster. Funny thing is, he might well be doing less damage than a Tempest Fighter.

 

[MrMyth]

It doesn't matter how you're allowed to wield them (in my opinion), if it doesn't have the weapon property (off-hand/2-hand) you don't get the bonus.

This. You get the Tempest bonus with off-hand weapons - which is to say, weapons with the 'off-hand' property. You get that bonus regardless of which hand in which you wield them, so a Tempest using two short swords would get the bonus with each. But a Tempest with the Two Weapon Warrior feat, using a Longsword in each hand, would not get the Tempest bonus with either weapon.

Note this is an intentional balance - Rangers get to use two larger weapons, while Tempest Fighters get to use smaller weapons but get bonuses with them to make up for it. If you let a character stack the two together, it would end up a bit too powerful - especially considering both builds are already very, very strong.

 

[Dan'L]

I will add in my agreement that the feat only applies to meeting the pre-requisites for wielding the weapon, and not for actually changing the weapon's properties. The "as if" is to apply an exception to the general rule that a one-handed weapon without the off-hand property cannot be wielded in the off hand; it does not grant a weapon wielded in such a way the off-hand property.

Sure this is nit-picky, but I believe it's what's intended. In the same way, I don't think you get to treat a longsword or bastard sword wielded in two hands as a two-handed weapon for the purposes of powers and feats that reward bonuses for 2-handed weapons (like Reaping Strike or the Bloodclaw enchant).

It doesn't matter how you're allowed to wield them (in my opinion), if it doesn't have the weapon property (off-hand/2-hand) you don't get the bonus.

As you can hopefully tell, in general I agree with you. I only want to point out, though, that while Reaping Strike specifies two-handed weapons, the Bloodclaw weapon actually does read for a weapon wielded in two hands -- which therefore does allow for versatile weapons to gain an extra damage bonus dependent upon how it is wielded.

-Dan'L