Heroditis
First Post
Batman is the Pinnacle of Human excellence
To me, the true super-power Batman possesses is his intelligence. Denny O'Neil (chief DC editor and the person who defined the "Silver Age" Batman once stated that given good inteligence and 6 months of preparation, Bats could defeat Galacticus (the most powerful destructive force in the Marvel Universe pre-Dark Phoenix). Remember, for decades prior to being "The Dark Knight," Batman was (and still is) "The Worlds Greatest Detective."
Additionaly, Bats is credited for being the number two martial artist in the world behind Lady Shiva.
The Bluff and Intimidate skills are virtually defined by Bats ability (at least in the DCU)
Also, given that Bats has taken down Supes (who I put on the power level of an ancient Red Dragon) on several occasions BY USING TACTICS, PREPARATION, AND LUCK, I have come up with the following stats/levels:
Bruce Wayne/Batman
Rogue: 20
Fighter: 4
Monk: 6
Str: 17
Dex: 18
Con: 16
Int: 22
Wis: 18
Cha: 20
As for allignment, the measure of morality has a fundementaly different structure than DnD -- which I think leads to the arguments about his DnD allignment. In the mainstream DCU, good and evil are defined heroicaly by if a character will take a human life premeditatedly. If a "hero" takes a human life, he can no longer be "good." So this places Batman's "code" as a defining measure of his "goodness" not his "lawfulness". The question of L vs Ch is about how you define lawfullness. If it is defined by your relationship to the ethics and mores of your culture Bats CANNOT be lawful, he explicitly rejects the laws of society as inadequate and/or currupt. If lawfullness is about your internal consistency and codes, he might be LG.
Just my two cents.
To me, the true super-power Batman possesses is his intelligence. Denny O'Neil (chief DC editor and the person who defined the "Silver Age" Batman once stated that given good inteligence and 6 months of preparation, Bats could defeat Galacticus (the most powerful destructive force in the Marvel Universe pre-Dark Phoenix). Remember, for decades prior to being "The Dark Knight," Batman was (and still is) "The Worlds Greatest Detective."
Additionaly, Bats is credited for being the number two martial artist in the world behind Lady Shiva.
The Bluff and Intimidate skills are virtually defined by Bats ability (at least in the DCU)
Also, given that Bats has taken down Supes (who I put on the power level of an ancient Red Dragon) on several occasions BY USING TACTICS, PREPARATION, AND LUCK, I have come up with the following stats/levels:
Bruce Wayne/Batman
Rogue: 20
Fighter: 4
Monk: 6
Str: 17
Dex: 18
Con: 16
Int: 22
Wis: 18
Cha: 20
As for allignment, the measure of morality has a fundementaly different structure than DnD -- which I think leads to the arguments about his DnD allignment. In the mainstream DCU, good and evil are defined heroicaly by if a character will take a human life premeditatedly. If a "hero" takes a human life, he can no longer be "good." So this places Batman's "code" as a defining measure of his "goodness" not his "lawfulness". The question of L vs Ch is about how you define lawfullness. If it is defined by your relationship to the ethics and mores of your culture Bats CANNOT be lawful, he explicitly rejects the laws of society as inadequate and/or currupt. If lawfullness is about your internal consistency and codes, he might be LG.
Just my two cents.